2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urbanization reshapes a food web

Abstract: Cities represent humanity's most intense impact on our planet, with more than half of all humans now residing in urban areas. Indeed, urbanization has well‐understood impacts on both individual species and general patterns of biodiversity. However, species do not exist in isolation, but are instead members of complex interaction networks that shape patterns of diversity and influence ecosystem services. Despite the importance of species interaction for creating patterns of diversity, we do not understand how u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban food webs tend to have fewer species, and more interactions per species (i.e. greater connectivity [107]), which might help to promote the exchange of microbiota between the microbiomes of co-occurring colonizing wildlife. Greater connectivity and spatial overlap between conand hetero-speci c hosts within urban environments could facilitate more frequent microbial dispersal when compared to rural sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban food webs tend to have fewer species, and more interactions per species (i.e. greater connectivity [107]), which might help to promote the exchange of microbiota between the microbiomes of co-occurring colonizing wildlife. Greater connectivity and spatial overlap between conand hetero-speci c hosts within urban environments could facilitate more frequent microbial dispersal when compared to rural sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban food webs tend to have fewer species, and more interactions per species (i.e. greater connectivity [107]), which might help to promote the exchange of microbiota between the microbiomes of co-occurring colonizing wildlife. Greater connectivity and spatial overlap between con-and hetero-specific hosts within urban environments could facilitate more frequent microbial dispersal when compared to rural sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remnant urban food webs have been shown to support less diverse ecological communities, with specialist species and rare species being particularly vulnerable. Urbanization can be seen as destabilizing, reshaping ecological stability and (dis)assembling species interactions (Start et al, 2020). We note that our intent with Figure 2 is not to define the only possible sets of food webs in specific combinations of ecological function, ecological intentionality, and space [i.e., the locations of the images in (x,y,z) space in Figure 2] but rather to encourage readers to consider the myriad possibilities about how effects of these different variables may play out in "natural" and designed food webs at different scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban food webs interact with human socioeconomic and cultural systems, including designed landscapes, governance structures, and social networks. The uniquely defined ecological communities and food webs found in urban ecosystems have been described using a variety of terms, from "urban assemblages" (Aronson et al, 2017) and "urban metacommunities" (Andrade et al, 2020) to "ecological networks across environmental gradients" (Tylianakis and Morris, 2017), "ecological networks" (or "meta-networks") (Mata et al, 2019), "interaction networks" (Start et al, 2020), living shorelines, and green infrastructure (Hostetler et al, 2011), as well as the more concise "urban food webs" (Faeth et al, 2005;Warren et al, 2006;Aronson et al, 2017) 2 . Each of these terms includes concepts from community, ecosystem, landscape, and urban ecology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%