2008
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808427105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urea denaturation by stronger dispersion interactions with proteins than water implies a 2-stage unfolding

Abstract: The mechanism of denaturation of proteins by urea is explored by using all-atom microseconds molecular dynamics simulations of hen lysozyme generated on BlueGene/L. Accumulation of urea around lysozyme shows that water molecules are expelled from the first hydration shell of the protein. We observe a 2-stage penetration of the protein, with urea penetrating the hydrophobic core before water, forming a ''dry globule.'' The direct dispersion interaction between urea and the protein backbone and side chains is st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

63
625
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 496 publications
(698 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
63
625
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous simulations show urea hydrogen bonding with the peptide carbonyl group, 22,44,45 whereas others see more significant hydrogen bonding with the peptide amides as opposed to the peptide carbonyl group. 46 To provide a further description of the nature of osmolyte and backbone correlations, we have calculated the solvent density profile around the peptide. The densities in Figure 6 correspond to regions of high probability for the particular solvent species to reside.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Some previous simulations show urea hydrogen bonding with the peptide carbonyl group, 22,44,45 whereas others see more significant hydrogen bonding with the peptide amides as opposed to the peptide carbonyl group. 46 To provide a further description of the nature of osmolyte and backbone correlations, we have calculated the solvent density profile around the peptide. The densities in Figure 6 correspond to regions of high probability for the particular solvent species to reside.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been confusion over the dominant free energy component of the direct mechanism of interaction between osmolytes and proteins: some have suggested interactions are driven by electrostatics, 40,44,45 whereas others have shown a dominant role of vdW interactions. 46 From our simulated solvation free energies, and the subsequent highly precise transfer free energy calculations, we are able to decompose the contributions of the dispersion and electrostatic interactions to the free energy of transfer of both protecting and denaturing osmolytes. We have shown that upon the transfer of the peptide backbone models from water to urea, the electrostatic component is actually highly unfavorable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Computer simulations have suggested that a denaturant can unfold a protein either by binding directly to the protein via hydrogen bonding, electrostatic, or van der Waals interactions, or by altering the solvent environment (35)(36)(37)(38). A very recent NMR study of HX at the peptide groups of dialanine has shown that GdnHCl, unlike urea, does not hydrogen bond to the peptide group (13).…”
Section: Unfolding Begins Similarly In Zero and High Denaturant Concementioning
confidence: 99%