2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urea Finishing Process: Prilling Versus Granulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, prilled urea formulation is more soluble in water than granular due to its smaller dimensions. At the same time, prills are more uniform in shape, whereas urea granules are easier to manage during bagging and transportation, and experience less breakage [12]. To address the issue of higher solubility and volatilization losses, a production methodology of slow-release urea fertilizer was developed in the last few decades [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, prilled urea formulation is more soluble in water than granular due to its smaller dimensions. At the same time, prills are more uniform in shape, whereas urea granules are easier to manage during bagging and transportation, and experience less breakage [12]. To address the issue of higher solubility and volatilization losses, a production methodology of slow-release urea fertilizer was developed in the last few decades [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to higher solubility of prills in water and its fragile nature in comparison to urea super granules. Small size of prills enhances its solubility within soil environment under moist and/or flooded conditions [9]. The higher solubility of urea prills contributes towards environmental pollution at global scale as the extra N is lost through leaching, runoff, denitrification and volatilization [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rst, due to loss of water below 100°C and the second, showing two peaks of maximum decomposition rate, at 150 and 200°C. Both correspond to the thermal degradation of urea, which occurs in two steps (Rahmanian et al 2015). In addition, the second peak also corresponds to the thermal decomposition of some polysacharides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%