2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ureterocalicostomy for Treatment of Complex Cases of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Renal function in the affected kidney improved from a mean of 54.6% preoperatively to 60.1% postoperatively. Osman et al reported that the success rate of 22 open UCs was 73% after a mean follow-up of 26.7 months [3]. They demonstrated that preoperative factors affecting the outcome of UC were a history of endopyelotomy or pyelonephritis, renal parenchymal thickening, split renal function and the extent of scarring score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renal function in the affected kidney improved from a mean of 54.6% preoperatively to 60.1% postoperatively. Osman et al reported that the success rate of 22 open UCs was 73% after a mean follow-up of 26.7 months [3]. They demonstrated that preoperative factors affecting the outcome of UC were a history of endopyelotomy or pyelonephritis, renal parenchymal thickening, split renal function and the extent of scarring score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most feared and frequent complication following ureterocalycostomy is recurrent obstruction. Success of UC has varied, with adult literature 60%‐77% 1,8 . and pediatric literature with a 70%‐90% success rate or greater 6,7,9–11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on UC comprises primarily of small case series and isolated case reports, with open surgery being the dominant treatment approach reported [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] . Different authors report variable success rates [14] depending on the indication (better in the primary setting than in the setting of previous intervention), age group (better for paediatric ≈90% [9] versus adult series 60–75% [13] ), and the endpoint chosen for follow-up (decrease with increase in the duration of follow-up).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%