1996
DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199601000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ureteroscopic Removal of Mid and Proximal Ureteral Calculi

Abstract: Our series demonstrates the high success rate that can be achieved with ureteroscopic removal of mid and proximal ureteral calculi. Thus, ureteroscopic treatment should be considered a treatment of choice for upper ureteral calculi.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Not all deposits, especially the impacted ones, can be passed spontaneously even though the have been broken by ESWL. That prolongs the duration of treatment and increases its costs, which is consistent with the opinion of Erhard et al [18]. Handled by an experienced specialist, URS is the most effective and least expensive of the current methods of treatment, which has been confirmed by Adolfsson et al [19], Wolf et al [20]and Grasso et al [20]on the basis of recent experience and retrospective studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not all deposits, especially the impacted ones, can be passed spontaneously even though the have been broken by ESWL. That prolongs the duration of treatment and increases its costs, which is consistent with the opinion of Erhard et al [18]. Handled by an experienced specialist, URS is the most effective and least expensive of the current methods of treatment, which has been confirmed by Adolfsson et al [19], Wolf et al [20]and Grasso et al [20]on the basis of recent experience and retrospective studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…From our experience it also follows that the ultimate results of ureteral lithotripsy are not dependent on the section where the stone is situated, but generally the procedure is easiest when the stones is located in the lower portion of the ureter [18, 19]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of one treatment was similar between ESWL and ureteroscopy. Erhard et al [1]presented their experience with 78 patients who underwent ureteroscopy for iliac or pelvic ureteral stones. 55% of the patients had already been submitted to different treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stratification of the results for the stone site, compared to those achieved with shock-wave lithotripsy [1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21], show that the one-session solution is more common in the iliac and especially lower ureter and that the accidental push up is not uncommon for the upper ureteric stones (table 3). For this purpose, irrigation should be kept to a minimum until the stone is reached and possibly entrapped within a basket.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation