2019
DOI: 10.2337/dc19-0967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary and Serum Angiogenic Markers in Women With Preexisting Diabetes During Pregnancy and Their Role in Preeclampsia Prediction

Abstract: To determine the correlation between urinary and serum placental growth factor (PlGF) and investigate the predictive value as pregnancy progresses of urinary PlGF compared with serum PlGF, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFLT-1), and the sFLT-1-to-PlGF ratio for the outcome of preeclampsia in women with preexisting diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted of 158 women with preexisting insulin-requiring diabetes (41 with type 1 and 117 with type 2). Urinary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No major advances have been made in this field since White’s classification ( White, 1949 ) and generalizing findings from studies of existing PE prediction models, such as the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm, is problematic due to the small number of women with T1DM in the study population ( Rolnik et al, 2017b ). This is despite previous reports of PE biomarkers performing differently in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes ( Zen et al, 2019 ). Moreover, large clinical trials investigating PE biomarkers and risk prediction models often pool data from type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus groups together or exclude them completely ( Agrawal et al, 2017 ; Guy et al, 2020 ; Serra et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No major advances have been made in this field since White’s classification ( White, 1949 ) and generalizing findings from studies of existing PE prediction models, such as the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm, is problematic due to the small number of women with T1DM in the study population ( Rolnik et al, 2017b ). This is despite previous reports of PE biomarkers performing differently in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes ( Zen et al, 2019 ). Moreover, large clinical trials investigating PE biomarkers and risk prediction models often pool data from type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus groups together or exclude them completely ( Agrawal et al, 2017 ; Guy et al, 2020 ; Serra et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Similarly, placental angiogenic markers were some of the poorest PE predictors discussed in this review ( Wotherspoon et al, 2016a ; Kelly et al, 2019 ). Despite the initial optimism surrounding angiogenic factor discovery ( Levine et al, 2004 ), their accuracy has been called into question in the general population ( Kleinrouweler et al, 2012 ), and a recent study of pregnant women with diabetes found that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was driven by PlGF in these pregnancies with little difference in sFlt-1 between the PE and normotensive groups ( Zen et al, 2019 ). Therefore, only PlGF might hold a benefit for PE prediction in a system with T1DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu and colleagues demonstrated that women with type 1 diabetes (DM1) and PE had increased sFlt1, decreased PlGF and increased sFlt1/PlGF ratio compared with controls 39 . Three others cohort studies investigating a preeclamptic population with preexisting diabetes, reported increased sFlt1, decreased PlGF and increased sFlt1/PlGF ratio before PE onset relative to non PE women [47][48][49] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The role of the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio has been documented previously in several studies conducted on type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus [ 53 , 54 ]; recently, Nuzzo et al [ 37 ] have also identified an increased placental and maternal sFlt1/PlGF ratio in women with GDM who develop preeclampsia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%