1987
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90695-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary digoxin-like immunoreactive substance in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The used anti-serum clearly discriminated Dg from its metabolites, 3) so the observed discrepancy could come from DLIS. DLIS has been reported in the sera of pregnant women, 10) newborn infants, 11) patients with renal 12) or hepatic disease. 13) The further experiments considering the patients' background are necessary to recognize the effect of DLIS with immunoassay, which can clarify the scope and limitation of immunoassay for the determination of Dg or digitoxin concentration in human fluids.…”
Section: Determination Of Dg In Sera Obtained From Digitalizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The used anti-serum clearly discriminated Dg from its metabolites, 3) so the observed discrepancy could come from DLIS. DLIS has been reported in the sera of pregnant women, 10) newborn infants, 11) patients with renal 12) or hepatic disease. 13) The further experiments considering the patients' background are necessary to recognize the effect of DLIS with immunoassay, which can clarify the scope and limitation of immunoassay for the determination of Dg or digitoxin concentration in human fluids.…”
Section: Determination Of Dg In Sera Obtained From Digitalizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The levels are also elevated in plasma and urine from pregnant women (Graves et al 1984;Vinge & Ekman 1988a). Urinary digoxin-like immunoreactive substance increases progressively during pregnancy, but falls rapidly following parturition (Friedman et al 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%