Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary diversion and bladder reconstruction/replacement using intestinal segments for intractable incontinence or following cystectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, there was no reported difference between ileal and colonic conduits with respect to pyelonephritis and uretero-intestinal anastomotic strictures. Similar results were seen with continent versus conduit diversion and, importantly, there was no difference in the rate of upper tract deterioration, unrelated to the type of anastomosis performed (refluxing vs. antirefluxing) [33].…”
Section: Urinary Diversionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Likewise, there was no reported difference between ileal and colonic conduits with respect to pyelonephritis and uretero-intestinal anastomotic strictures. Similar results were seen with continent versus conduit diversion and, importantly, there was no difference in the rate of upper tract deterioration, unrelated to the type of anastomosis performed (refluxing vs. antirefluxing) [33].…”
Section: Urinary Diversionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The overall long-term complication rate of urinary diversions approaches 60%, with stomal complication and UTIs being the most common [67].…”
Section: Urinary Diversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Another review, which considered urinary diversion and bladder replacement surgery, found only two eligible randomised trials, both with little usable evidence. 6 Although sacral nerve stimulation has potential as an effective management option, numbers of patients in published trials have been small and uncertainty remains about the most effective and reliable implantation techniques and the best ways to select patients. 5 In recent US clinical practice guidelines on bladder management after spinal cord injury, only one of the 57 detailed recommendations relating to conservative, surgical, and pharmacological interventions is based on evidence from a sufficiently powered randomised controlled trial.…”
Section: What Is the Evidence Of Uncertainty?mentioning
confidence: 99%