2011
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.172254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary Excretion Kinetics of 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy) and Its Phase I and Phase II Metabolites in Humans following Controlled MDMA Administration

Abstract: BACKGROUND 3,4-Methylendioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is excreted in human urine as unchanged drug and phase I and II metabolites. Previous urinary excretion studies after controlled oral MDMA administration have been performed only after conjugate cleavage. Therefore, we investigated intact MDMA glucuronide and sulfate metabolite excretion. METHODS We used LC–high-resolution MS and GC-MS to reanalyze blind urine samples from 10 participants receiving 1.0 or 1.6 mg/kg MDMA orally. We determined median Cmax, tma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo, sulfation initially predominated, changing to comparable amounts of both conjugates after approximately 3 hours, explainable by differences in enzymatic affinity and capacity observed in vitro. While SULTs show much higher affinity for HMMA, they are easily saturated, and the higher capacity UGTs can take over (Schwaninger et al, 2009(Schwaninger et al, , 2011a(Schwaninger et al, , 2011c. Consequently, the phase II metabolites should be the main metabolites in plasma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In vivo, sulfation initially predominated, changing to comparable amounts of both conjugates after approximately 3 hours, explainable by differences in enzymatic affinity and capacity observed in vitro. While SULTs show much higher affinity for HMMA, they are easily saturated, and the higher capacity UGTs can take over (Schwaninger et al, 2009(Schwaninger et al, , 2011a(Schwaninger et al, , 2011c. Consequently, the phase II metabolites should be the main metabolites in plasma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minor pathway includes the formation of 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) by N-demethylation followed again by O-demethylation, O-methylation, and conjugation (Maurer, 1996;Maurer et al, 2000;de la Torre et al, 2004). Analysis of urine samples after recreational MDMA consumption revealed MDMA and primarily phase II metabolites (DHMA 3-sulfate, HMMA 4-sulfate, and HMMA 4-glucuronide) as major excretion products (Schwaninger et al, 2011a). Other metabolites could only be detected at negligible concentrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The S-enantiomer of MDMA is eliminated at a higher rate than the R-enantiomer The analytes included in the method were chosen based on the main metabolites identified in urine [20] and on the measurement of five authentic MDMA blood samples checking for all possible metabolites. In these samples mainly MDMA, HMMA 4-sulfate, HMMA 4-glucuronide, and DHMA 3-sulfate could be detected.…”
Section: Lc-ms/ms Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minor pathway includes demethylation to 3,4-methylendioxyamphetamine (MDA) followed by demethylenation to 3,4-dihydroxyamphetamine, O-methylation to 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyamphetamine (HMA) and conjugation [17][18][19]. In urine samples of recreational MDMA users following a controlled single dose of MDMA, DHMA 3-sulfate, HMMA 4-sulfate and HMMA 4-glucuronide were detected as major metabolites next to unchanged MDMA [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, this metabolite was predominantly conjugated but interestingly, the main fraction was glucuronide-conjugated in Cases 2 and 6, sulpho-conjugated in Cases 1 and 3, and somewhat of an equal distribution in Cases 4 and 5. [14] Although number of cases in our study is small, and no background information was available on the dosing and timing of 2-AEPB, these observations underlines the variability of the routine samples that the laboratory should be able to handle in order to maintain effective drug-of-abuse testing. Furthermore, taking into account the origin of the samples and potentially high degree of drug abuse, the effect of enzyme induction or inhibition cannot be ruled out.…”
Section: In Vivo Metabolism Of 2-amino-n-ethyl-1-phenylbutane: Excretmentioning
confidence: 88%