1956
DOI: 10.2307/4589402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary Excretion of Fluoride following Defluoridation of a Water Supply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While information is not available as to the water F level in the area from which these children moved to their present residence, we may speculate that certainly in the majority of cases they came from areas with higher levels of F in the drinking water, that the present high output of F in the urine is a factor of past water F exposure, and that the children con tinue to mobilize skeletal F deposited prior to moving into the test area. This premise is supported by the finding of Likins et al [1956] that urinary F values in children re mained near 2 ppm 27 months after the drinking water F level was decreased from 8.0 to 1.0 ppm. While F levels in the study of Likins et al are much higher than in the present study, the parallel is apparent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While information is not available as to the water F level in the area from which these children moved to their present residence, we may speculate that certainly in the majority of cases they came from areas with higher levels of F in the drinking water, that the present high output of F in the urine is a factor of past water F exposure, and that the children con tinue to mobilize skeletal F deposited prior to moving into the test area. This premise is supported by the finding of Likins et al [1956] that urinary F values in children re mained near 2 ppm 27 months after the drinking water F level was decreased from 8.0 to 1.0 ppm. While F levels in the study of Likins et al are much higher than in the present study, the parallel is apparent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This 23-fold difference in water F was associated with a 19-fold urinary F difference. The studies of Likins et al [1956] in adults drinking water at 8.0 ppm F and for 27 months after adjustment to 1.0 ppm demonstrated clearly that skeletal F stored while drinking the high-F water was still being mobilized more than 2 years after water adjustment. Zipkin et al [1956] found that as early as 1 week after water F levels were adjusted from 0.1-0.3 to 1.0 ppm children and adults were respond ing differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may speculate that if the period of F interruption were longer, UFE might continue to decline over time, albeit very slowly. A previous study reported that UFE continued to exhibit a slight decrease even after 113 weeks; however, subjects had been chronically exposed to an above-optimal water supply (8.0 ppm F) and the water was de-fluoridated to an optimal level (0.7 ppm F) [13]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is a lack of methodological standardization in studies investigating UFE following the discontinuation of F intake. Such studies have comprised individuals in different age groups [13,14], with different sources of F, such as in supplements [14,15] or milk [15], and different F concentrations [13]. Considering the lack of scientific evidence on the effect of the discontinuation of F from water and toothpaste, it is important to investigate the release of F retained following the discontinuation of intake and the effect after F re-exposure under controlled conditions, using urine as a biomarker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elim ination of excess fluoride stored in th e system m ay persist for m onths and even years [12,13]. In low-fluoride areas (D etroit, Mich., 0.1 to 0.2 p.p.m .…”
Section: Role O F Fluoridesmentioning
confidence: 99%