1993
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary mercury excretion in chloralkali workers after the cessation of exposure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such fluctuation would likely bias the study results toward the null because a subject’s fish consumption may either increase or decrease during the 2–6 months before the survey. Seventh, day-to-day variability in urinary mercury excretion has been reported to average 22% among samples taken on three consecutive days (Ellingsen et al 1993). However, this magnitude of variation is modest, and the likely impact would be to bias the results toward the null.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such fluctuation would likely bias the study results toward the null because a subject’s fish consumption may either increase or decrease during the 2–6 months before the survey. Seventh, day-to-day variability in urinary mercury excretion has been reported to average 22% among samples taken on three consecutive days (Ellingsen et al 1993). However, this magnitude of variation is modest, and the likely impact would be to bias the results toward the null.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence one could speculate mechanistically that, after exposure cessation, the U-NAG activity would decrease. This decrease might be related to the decrease in U-Hg, which occurs with a half-time of about 60-80 days (31). After the normalization of U-NAG, the normal process of ageing might occur in the previously exposed persons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 3 week follow-up of six workers with long-term exposure to inorganic mercury (mercury vapour), a fast initial decrease in the urinary mercury concentration was observed with a halftime of approximately 3 d, followed by a slow excretion phase with an elimination rate constant of 0.01 d 21 . 7 In another study of long-term elimination of mercury, a group of 17 workers were on average followed for more than a year and the median half-time for elimination of occupationally acquired mercury was found to be close to 75 d with a range from 27 to 96 d. 8 It was not clear whether the variation in half-times depended on duration of exposure, which in this study group varied from 3 d to 35 years. Other authors, based on comparisons of elimination half-times in workers exposed for short or longer periods, have suggested the presence of different compartments for mercury deposition with different elimination half-times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%