2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary Morbidity in Men Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Localized Prostate Cancer Following Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this analysis, acute and late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group urinary toxicity were not significantly different between the TURP versus non-TURP cohorts. Finally, a cohort of 47 patients treated with SBRT (35e36.25 Gy in five fractions) with a history of prior TURP was retrospectively analysed in terms of physician-reported toxicities and patient-reported QoL [69]. With a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, late grade 2 and grade 3 genitourinary toxicity occurred in 48.9% and 6.4% men, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, acute and late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group urinary toxicity were not significantly different between the TURP versus non-TURP cohorts. Finally, a cohort of 47 patients treated with SBRT (35e36.25 Gy in five fractions) with a history of prior TURP was retrospectively analysed in terms of physician-reported toxicities and patient-reported QoL [69]. With a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, late grade 2 and grade 3 genitourinary toxicity occurred in 48.9% and 6.4% men, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in another study matching 50 patients treated with prior TURP (patients with multiple TURP and/or previous adenomectomy were excluded) to a similar cohort of 50 consecutive patients who had no prior TURP before starting SBRT during the same period, this correlation was not observed [18]. Similarly, Pepin et al [19] in a retrospective analysis of 47 patients with a history of prior TURP (including multiple TURP) treated with prostate SBRT showed that genitourinary toxicity rates were overall comparable with patients treated with conventionally fractioned EBRT. Although direct comparisons between studies have many inherent limitations, toxicity results of our series suggest a possible increase in moderate and severe genitourinary toxicity following SBRT in patients with a previous history of TURP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…All patients were staged with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate and bone scan in case of Gleason Score >7 and/or prostate-specific antigen >10 ng/ml. Eligible patients for SBRT presented a localised prostate cancer, with an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) 19. Previous TURP or prostate adenomectomy procedures were allowed provided there was at least an 8-week interval with SBRT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is a concern that radical prostatectomy can be overtreatment as some patients will be reported as pT0. Radiotherapy is an effective treatment method with acceptable toxicity in patients who underwent TURP, incontinence rates are slightly higher compared to the patients without TURP (24,25). In this study, data on the continence status of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy are lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%