“…The following experimental conditions were tested for the fine-tuning and validation of a methodology to quantify BDNF protein in human urine samples, in accordance with an appropriate QA/QC process: (i) analysis of urine samples with and without pre-treatment (acidifying, extracting and/or lyophilizing of biological samples); (ii) dilution (or not) of samples; (iii) testing of different sample volumes (range 0.1–0.8 ml); and (iv) selection of commercial ELISA kits, based on the literature ( Supplementary Table 2 ), because ELISA techniques have demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for the evaluation of BDNF levels ( Sakamoto et al, 2018 ). The Emax ® ImmunoAssay System ELISA kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, United States), one of the kits most commonly used to determine BDNF in urine samples ( Pinto et al, 2010 ; Antunes-Lopes et al, 2013 , 2017 ; Jiang et al, 2014 ; Morizawa et al, 2019 ), has been discontinued. Other ELISA kits previously used for this purpose could not be used because samples were always below their LOD, with or without pretreatment, including the Quantikine ® Total BDNF and Human BDNF ELISA kits (cat# DBNT00, cat# E-EL-H0010, and cat# EK-033-22), supplied by R&D System, Elabscience and Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, respectively ( Polacchini et al, 2015 ; Pennycuff et al, 2017 ; Rada et al, 2020 ).…”