Neuro-urology and urodynamics have, during the last 10 years, grown to become a major part of urological management and practice. In this evolution, the spinal cord injured patient has often been the model for the development of investi gation techniques, methodology and treatment. The growing understanding of what is happening in the lower urinary tract of spinal men, made the management of the bladder dysfunction in these patients more accurate. As a direct result of this, urinary complications have become less frequent and urological pathology is no longer the most important cause of death after spinal cord injury. Although this must be a reason for contentment, one should be aware that this result was only obtained by very high standards of treatment, and by an intensive longterm follow-up. Without a doubt any lapse in management would soon lead to new disasters. Indeed, today we are no nearer to the solution of producing neuro logical recovery: the dysfunction of the lower urinary tract continues to be one of the most hazardous of neurological deficits seen after spinal cord injury and its possible disturbance of renal function is still directly life-threatening.The actual urological management can be considered in three distinct periods: a period of bladder drainage in the acute post-injury phase when the lower urinary tract has no active function because of spinal shock; the period of bladder re-education when a new and safe way of regular bladder emptying has to be obtained; the urological follow-up which has to be thorough and lifelong.Treatment of urological complications may be necessary in each of these periods.The value of intermittent catheterisation in the period of spinal shock has been well documented. Without a doubt this method is the best one, as it leaves the bladder without foreign material, provides its regular complete emptying and results in very few complications if properly performed. In the context of comprehensive management in a spinal unit, the non-touch technique done by a catheter team, will most certainly give a maximum of guarantee for the bladder wall to remain in a favourable condition while awaiting its activity to restart (Bedbrook 198 1). Recently a renewed interest has been shown in fine bore suprapubic cystostomy. This method has proved to be useful and safe in the first few days post-injury when extensive fluctuations of diuresis are seen which could lead to bladder overdistention between con secutive catheterisations.As soon as patients recover from spinal shock, a thorough evaluation of the lower urinary tract function has to be done. In those with a complete spinal lesion, the value of a clinical neurological investigation is still very important.