2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173694.86127.ae
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uroflow Nomogram for Male Adolescents

Abstract: Voiding volumes in a large homogenous adolescent group demonstrated optimal Qmax at voiding volumes between 350 and 550 cc with a decrease at higher volumes. Therefore, uroflow studies in adolescent males should be interpreted with caution at volumes less than 350 and more than 550 cc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qmax values in our population of adult males was 22.8 ml/sec, which is lower than 28.4 ml/sec and 31.2 ml/sec in the Austrian male adolescent and Thai population, respectively. [1415] Qmax values in the elderly population were 17.04 ml/sec significantly lower than the study in the Thai population (27.5 ml/sec). [15]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Qmax values in our population of adult males was 22.8 ml/sec, which is lower than 28.4 ml/sec and 31.2 ml/sec in the Austrian male adolescent and Thai population, respectively. [1415] Qmax values in the elderly population were 17.04 ml/sec significantly lower than the study in the Thai population (27.5 ml/sec). [15]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…3 Qmax is largely dependent on the volume voided and, thus, nomograms have been developed to establish expected flow rates in pediatric populations. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Unfortunately, values have not been established for early adolescent boys. This is of particular interest as urethral development is prominent during early puberty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pernkopf et al . () also found a positive correlation between the two up to a VV of 350 mL in an adolescent population (Pernkopf et al ., ), followed by plateau to 500 mL and then a decline (Von Garrets, ; Chancellor et al ., ; Kumar et al ., ). Likewise, in the present study, the factors found to affect pre‐operative and post‐operative Qmax most significantly were pre‐operative and post‐operative VV respectively (Tables and ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%