urine has been known for almost a century;Br\l=u"\cke 1 first mentioned it in 1861, Frouin 2 described it in 1904, and Gottlieb3 further added to its understanding in 1924. It remained dormant until 1946, when Farnsworth 4 published a review of the literature, with comments on the absence of this pepsinlike substance in the urine of perniciousanemia patients. The following year, Bucher 5 evaluated the effects of varied diets on this urinary substance, now termed "uropepsin," hereafter referred to as U-P (the end-product of uropepsinogen activation). The last decade has seen a renewed interest in U-P studies, further intensified by the impact of Selye's "Adaptation Syndrome" and the emergence of endocrinology from its early theoretical stage to the maturity of the corticotropin-cortisone era, and strengthened by innumerable practitioners who would spare their patients the discomforts of the stomach tube.Our purpose in this paper is (1) to present our experiences in the study of U-P excretion while covering a kaleidoscope of diseases and derangements, (2) to compare these studies with the results of the many other workers in this fruitful vineyard, and (3) to assess the role of this laboratory test in clinical medicine.
Review of the LiteratureWest 8 noted the day-to-day constancy of U-P excretion; this is contradicted by the antithetical findings of Goodman.9 Broh-Kahn " notes close agreement of the day versus night excretion, but West8 finds a slight decrease in excretion in the afternoon and evening. Broh-Kahn 7 found no signif¬ icant changes in LT-P excretion due to volume, specific gravity, or acidity of the urine. A high-protein diet caused an in¬ creased U-P excretion in Bucher's study,5 but Goodman9 found a high-protein diet productive of normal values only. Bucher 5 also noted a decreased excretion by subjects given a high-carbohydrate diet. Several observers "·" found constant excretion pat¬ terns in subjects given normal diets.Bridgwater et al.38 found U-P excretion by males to be 60% greater than by females; decreased excretion was observed in pré¬ adolescents and "adults over 60." U-P and 17-ketosteroid excretion patterns correlated well in young men, according to Garst,10 but rather poorly in older men.Mertenc found decreased excretion in infectious diseases and undernutrition; Tobler 13 noted significant elevations in pa¬ tients after vaginal or abdominal surgery.Both atropine 12 and propantheline (Pro-Banthine) 14 may cause a decrease in U-P excretion; the Rauwolfia drugs41 exert little influence.Numerous observers ».*M2,i«-ii> nave founcl significant increases in U-P excretion in cases of duodenal ulcer. However, some9 have remarked on the significant percentage of patients with duodenal ulcer who excrete normal amounts of U-P. Others i2 report