2001
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-001-0613-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US and MRI of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

Abstract: Abdominal problems often complicate the clinical course after bone marrow transplantation. Graft-versus-host disease occurs as a complication of allogenic bone marrow transplantation. In this report, the findings of intestinal involvement are described and correlated with histopathological findings. Increased bowel-wall thickness and increased vascularity were shown by US. MRI demonstrated generalised increased bowel-wall thickness associated with bowel-wall enhancement after administration of i.v. gadolinium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetic resonance imaging-based studies currently consist only of case reports. 12,13 Basically, magnetic resonance imaging findings are reported to be nearly identical to the known CT features. Figure 1 Mean maximum signal increase is calculated by subtracting the baseline signal (dB during the first second of examination) from the maximum signal during the first 100 s recorded after i.v.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging-based studies currently consist only of case reports. 12,13 Basically, magnetic resonance imaging findings are reported to be nearly identical to the known CT features. Figure 1 Mean maximum signal increase is calculated by subtracting the baseline signal (dB during the first second of examination) from the maximum signal during the first 100 s recorded after i.v.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Work on diagnostic blood assays have identified biomarkers, but more work needs to be done to validate these in multicenter prospective studies prior to widespread clinical use (31). Moreover, while noninvasive conventional imaging has played a role in aGVHD management, the structural manifestations that are detectable often only present at the latest of disease stages (32,33). Molecular imaging of aGVHD, which may yield more sensitive detection, has been very limited, mostly focusing on PET imaging using [ 18 F]FDG (34), a non-specific tracer with high uptake in many cell types and conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other imaging techniques have also shown promise for definitive diagnosis of aGVHD, particularly gastrointestinal manifestations of the disease, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), high-resolution transabdominal ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound (32,33). These techniques primarily focus on detection of edema and thickening of the intestinal wall during advanced stages of aGVHD, and are therefore likely limited for early disease detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they have not been validated for monitoring of treatment response of intestinal GVHD, but are suitable to detect pathological features of advanced intestinal GVHD such as thickening and edema of the intestinal wall. 48,49 Thus, they may be useful complementary diagnostic methods providing additional information particularly in advanced or treatment refractory stages of intestinal GVHD. 43,50,51 Our clinical results demonstrate that FDG-PET imaging can advance noninvasive diagnostic mapping and monitoring of intestinal GVHD and possibly allow early prognostic assessment of GVHD responsiveness to therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%