2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9206-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US and UK versions of the EQ-5D preference weights: Does choice of preference weights make a difference?

Abstract: EQ-5D index scores generated using UK and US preference weights showed equivalent psychometric properties. For assessing treatment benefit in a single population, the use of either the UK or US weights as a measure of HRQOL will not change inferences. However, for comparisons across US and UK populations, the choice between these two weights should be based on their relevance to the study population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between mean utilities estimated by the UK and US tariff are consistent with previous studies that have shown that EQ-5D index scores are slightly higher when using US weights as compared with UK weights [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The differences between mean utilities estimated by the UK and US tariff are consistent with previous studies that have shown that EQ-5D index scores are slightly higher when using US weights as compared with UK weights [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We used the English scoring system 23 to translate the health states of our participants into utility scores ranging from 0 (worst health) to 1 (perfect health). Although the American and English scoring systems have been found to generate EQ-5D index scores with equivalent psychometric properties in the measurement of quality of life, 24 we verified that our results were consistent when using the American scoring system. 25 …”
Section: Outcome Measuressupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It comprises five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) which can be rated with either three or five levels of severity (ranging from no problems to extreme problems) depending on the precise measure chosen. 129,130 Scores from the health states are converted through value sets (or preference weights) obtained from general population studies to generate a single utility value. 129,130 This utility ranges from 0.59 to 1 and represents health on a continuum from worst to best (negative values are valued as worse than dead).…”
Section: Systematic Review Of Health-related Quality Of Life Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…129,130 Scores from the health states are converted through value sets (or preference weights) obtained from general population studies to generate a single utility value. 129,130 This utility ranges from 0.59 to 1 and represents health on a continuum from worst to best (negative values are valued as worse than dead). The value sets applied can be derived using either a VAS or time trade-off (TTO) technique.…”
Section: Systematic Review Of Health-related Quality Of Life Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation