2012
DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgs041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US - Clove Cigarettes and US - Tuna II (Mexico): Implications for the Role of Regulatory Purpose under Article III:4 of the GATT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…69 However, this article could be interpreted a bit more broadly than in the context of trade law. Indeed, in ITL, the difference of treatment allowed under Article XX must be based on the product.…”
Section: The Mere Use Of General Exceptions: a Possibly Dramatic Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…69 However, this article could be interpreted a bit more broadly than in the context of trade law. Indeed, in ITL, the difference of treatment allowed under Article XX must be based on the product.…”
Section: The Mere Use Of General Exceptions: a Possibly Dramatic Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 Even in the frame of ITL, it has been considered restrictive, although it is used to excuse differences of treatment for a much smaller ran-ge of measures. 69 However, this article could be interpreted a bit more broadly than in the context of trade law. Indeed, in ITL, the difference of treatment allowed under Article XX must be based on the product.…”
Section: The Mere Use Of General Exceptions: a Possibly Dramatic Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this occasion, the AB resorted to contextual-teleological interpretations in order to introduce ‘GATT Article XX flexibilities’ into the national treatment rule of the TBT Agreement, which lacks a general exception clause 43 . As several commentators have noted, such moves away from strictly textual interpretations toward contextual-teleological ones, which allow for less intrusive interpretations of WTO rules, help reduce public pressure on the DSS and secure a basic level of legitimacy for the WTO (DiMascio and Pauwelyn, 2008: 65; Zhou, 2012: 1082–83).…”
Section: Goal-shifting: a Tale Of Two Categories Of Wto Disputesmentioning
confidence: 99%