2008
DOI: 10.1017/s1474745608003728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US – Countervailing Duty Investigation of DRAMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An issue in Japan–DRAMs , as in US–DRAMS (Francois and Palmeter, 2008), was whether Korea entrusted or directed private creditors to participate in the restructuring of Hynix, thereby providing a subsidy within the meaning of Article 1.1 of the Agreement. As in the US–DRAMS case, the Appellate Body disagreed with the methodology used by the Panel to evaluate evidence.…”
Section: Important Issues Of Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An issue in Japan–DRAMs , as in US–DRAMS (Francois and Palmeter, 2008), was whether Korea entrusted or directed private creditors to participate in the restructuring of Hynix, thereby providing a subsidy within the meaning of Article 1.1 of the Agreement. As in the US–DRAMS case, the Appellate Body disagreed with the methodology used by the Panel to evaluate evidence.…”
Section: Important Issues Of Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work (Francois andPalmeter, 2008 andPrusa, 2008) has addressed the US-DRAMS case. 2 In this article, we discuss the legal and economic issues that we think were most important in the Japan-DRAMs case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation