2014
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.7.3179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US-guided 14G Core Needle Biopsy: Comparison Between Underestimated and Correctly Diagnosed Breast Cancers

Abstract: Background: The purpose of study was to evaluate radiologic or clinical features of breast cancer undergoing ultrasound (US)-guided 14G core needle biopsy (CNB) and analyze the differences between underestimated and accurately diagnosed groups. Materials and Methods: Of 1,898 cases of US-guided 14G CNB in our institute, 233 cases were proven to be cancer by surgical pathology. The pathologic results from CNB were invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (n=157), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n=40), high-risk lesions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the limitations of CNB is the histologic underestimation of breast malignancy, which means that lesions found to be high-risk or DCIS by a percutaneous breast biopsy are upgraded to DCIS or invasive cancer after surgical excision. In previous studies, the underestimation rates ranged from 6.25% to 65% for ADH and from 16% to 66% for DCIS using CNB or vacuum-assisted biopsy [ 13 , 32 - 35 ]. Our underestimation rates were 24.5% for high-risk lesions (79 of 322) and 33.6% for DCIS (111 of 330), comparable with previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations of CNB is the histologic underestimation of breast malignancy, which means that lesions found to be high-risk or DCIS by a percutaneous breast biopsy are upgraded to DCIS or invasive cancer after surgical excision. In previous studies, the underestimation rates ranged from 6.25% to 65% for ADH and from 16% to 66% for DCIS using CNB or vacuum-assisted biopsy [ 13 , 32 - 35 ]. Our underestimation rates were 24.5% for high-risk lesions (79 of 322) and 33.6% for DCIS (111 of 330), comparable with previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%