respectively. The proportion of nondiagnostic of FNAs was significantly lower than the proportion of nondiagnostic FNC samples in nodules that measured >20.0 mm (P 5.037). Scores for the 4 diagnostic parameters were significantly greater in FNAs than in FNC samples in nodules that measured from 5.1 to 10.0 mm and >20.0 mm (all P <.05); however, similar results were not observed in the nodules that measured 5.0 mm or from 10.1 to 20.0 mm (all P >.05). Also, FNA yielded significantly more diagnostically superior specimens than FNC sampling in nodules that measured from 5.1 to 10.0 mm and >20.0 mm (P <.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: The current findings indicated that FNA may be more suitable than FNC for sampling nodules that measure from 5.1 to 10.0 mm and >20.0 mm; whereas, for nodules that measure 5.0 mm and from 10.1 to 20.0 mm, the 2 techniques could yield specimens with similar quality. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2014;122:266-73. V C 2013 American Cancer Society.KEY WORDS: thyroid nodule; cytopathology; fine-needle aspiration; fine-needle capillary.
INTRODUCTIONThyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a safe, simple, relatively accurate, and first-line diagnostic tool in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. [1][2][3] There is no doubt that FNA has contributed toward avoiding a large number of unnecessary surgeries in the past several decades. However, it is also generally believed that this aspiration technique frequently leads to microscopic hemorrhages, which are an obstacle to proper cytologic interpretation. In an attempt to overcome this problem, fine-needle capillary (FNC) sampling, a technique without aspiration, was developed in the 1980s. 4 It has been suggested that this nonaspiration sampling technique could reduce the amount of blood in samples and produce superior quality specimens. Original ArticleIn the literature, many studies have focused on comparisons between thyroid FNA and FNC sampling. Some studies confirmed that FNC yielded sampling material with better quality cellularity and less blood stains compared with FNA, 6-12 whereas other reports indicated that there was no significant difference between the 2 techniques. 13,14 There were some limitations in those studies.First, ultrasound (US) guidance, which is superior to palpation guidance for obtaining adequate material, 15 was not used in most studies. Second, most of those studies were based on a small sample size. Third, the influence of nodule size on FNA and FNC sampling was not specifically addressed. Therefore, the current study was designed to compare the sampling efficiency of US-guided FNA and FNC sampling in 280 thyroid nodules in which the influence of nodule size was specifically analyzed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PatientsThis prospective study was approved by our institutional ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. The study was carried out from June 2012 to August 2012 and enrolled 275 patients, including 215 women and 60 men (mean age 6 standard deviation [SD], 45.51 6 13.83 years; age range, 14-78 ye...