2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US policy spillover(?) – China’s accession to the WTO and rising exports to the EU

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Mau (2017) shows that a reduction in US tariff uncertainty following China's WTO accession also positively affected China's exports to the European Union. 3 Pierce and Schott (2016) already provide some evidence, amongst other results, that a reduction in domestic TPU can determine an increase in the number of importing firms at home, in addition to an increase in the number of exporting firms abroad.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Mau (2017) shows that a reduction in US tariff uncertainty following China's WTO accession also positively affected China's exports to the European Union. 3 Pierce and Schott (2016) already provide some evidence, amongst other results, that a reduction in domestic TPU can determine an increase in the number of importing firms at home, in addition to an increase in the number of exporting firms abroad.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such policy change was China's transition to permanent normal trade relations (PNTR) with the US, which entailed a lower threat of sudden tariff increases and an expansion of Chinese exports (Pierce and Schott, 2016;Handley and Limão, 2017;Feng et al, 2017). 15 Mau (2017) shows that the 15 Uncertainty arose from the fact that MFN rates were granted only for one year and were subject to review and approval by the US Congress before being renewed. While the US never actually applied these higher rates on Chinese products, a potential negative decision would have entailed Chinese exporters facing transition to US PNTR also triggered an acceleration of China's exports to the EU15 and other large high-income destinations.…”
Section: Displacement Of Exports Through Chinese Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, studies employing this measure typically rely on aggregate sector-level data. Since we attempt to evaluate competition effects between countries exporting to the same third market, we are confident that import market shares are an appropriate measure for the purposes of our analysis.12 Preference shifts in a large destination market could have implications for China's multilateral trade performance (e.g Mau, 2017)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some services or manufactured commodities might have some inferiority characteristics. Or some determinants might have an inferior role for manufacturing exporters as depicted in Mau (2017). Mau (2017) reveals that the global fixed costs are significantly relevant for services trade and that, according to some firm-level studies, global fixed costs might play an inferior role for manufacturing exporters.…”
Section: The Theoretical and Empirical Facts Underpinning The Estimation Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or some determinants might have an inferior role for manufacturing exporters as depicted in Mau (2017). Mau (2017) reveals that the global fixed costs are significantly relevant for services trade and that, according to some firm-level studies, global fixed costs might play an inferior role for manufacturing exporters. The Turkish manufacture sector covers the food products, beverages, tobacco products, textiles, wearing apparel, leather and related products, wood and products of wood and cork (except furniture), paper and paper products, coke and refined petroleum products, chemicals and chemical products, rubber and plastic products, fabricated metal products, electrical equipment, machinery and equipment n.e.c., motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers, furniture and other products.…”
Section: The Theoretical and Empirical Facts Underpinning The Estimation Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%