2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.07.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US stock market efficiency over weekly, monthly, quarterly and yearly time scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zapart shows that more regularities are to be found on smaller scales (which is consistent with our results), but he uses Approximate Entropy, which cannot be directly linked to predictability [19]. Finally, Rodriguez et al show differences at scales ranging from a week to a year, while we are interested in intraday scales [18]. This paper can be thought of as an application of the multiscale entropy analysis framework to testing the efficiency of financial markets [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zapart shows that more regularities are to be found on smaller scales (which is consistent with our results), but he uses Approximate Entropy, which cannot be directly linked to predictability [19]. Finally, Rodriguez et al show differences at scales ranging from a week to a year, while we are interested in intraday scales [18]. This paper can be thought of as an application of the multiscale entropy analysis framework to testing the efficiency of financial markets [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, we do not know how this predictability changes with varying time scales, which is the subject of this paper. Some papers have partially explored this question, but their methodology leaves something to be desired [17][18][19]. Aghamohammadi et al show complexity at different sampling rates, which are not equivalent to different scales as understood in this study, and we find this approach less interesting, as it ignores a lot of market activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Rizvi and Arshad (2017) using MFDFA and MGARCH technique found that Japan improved efficiency over the period. Rodriguez et al (2014) employed the DFA technique and found the US market efficiency varies over time and time scales.…”
Section: Testing Efficiency Using Both Modified-standard and Mf-dfa Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Clark-West (CW) test was proposed to adjust Diebold Mariano (DM) statistics since the originally proposed test statistics were upward biased heavily if models tested were nested. The test statistics is defined in Equation (14).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It becomes increasingly clear that the incorporation of the nonlinear and complex dynamics during the modeling process provide the promising alternative to deeper understanding of the market dynamics and higher level of forecasting accuracy, especially when the modeling and forecasting exercises are conducted at the daily frequency level, higher than three weekly and monthly frequency in the literature. Rodriguez et al [14] showed that the level of market efficiency varies across different time scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%