Proceedings of the 11th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2525194.2525202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability evaluation of messenger applications for Android phones using cognitive walkthrough

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the previous studies applied usability evaluations to mobile IM apps, the most similar study to this paper was an evaluation made in 2013: a MIM usability evaluation on Android devices [74] using cognitive walkthrough in a laboratory environment with the assistance of six evaluators. Due to, in the authors' opinion, the impossibility to target all existing IM apps on markets, they used a review on the best Android platform applications (based on users' opinions) published by the "PC Magazine" website [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the previous studies applied usability evaluations to mobile IM apps, the most similar study to this paper was an evaluation made in 2013: a MIM usability evaluation on Android devices [74] using cognitive walkthrough in a laboratory environment with the assistance of six evaluators. Due to, in the authors' opinion, the impossibility to target all existing IM apps on markets, they used a review on the best Android platform applications (based on users' opinions) published by the "PC Magazine" website [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Back in 2013, IM usability evaluation on Android devices was conducted [59]. This analysis was conducted using the Cognitive Walkthrough methodology in a laboratory environment with six evaluators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It represents tasks and related action sequences involved in task completion, and highlights possible problems [5]. So, it brings out related problems which are faced by users while executing specific action sequence during user interaction with the system [15]. There are several important tasks such as storage of food item, checking out its quantity and expiry, monitoring condition, cleaning of food carriers and so on.…”
Section: Sequence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%