Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review

Abstract

Background Usability is a key factor affecting the acceptance of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) for elderly individuals, but traditional usability evaluation methods may not be suitable for use in this population because of aging barriers. The objectives of this study were to identify, explore, and summarize the current state of the literature on the usability evaluation of mHealth apps for older adults and to incorporate these methods into the appropriate evaluation stage. Methods Electronic searches were conducted in 10 databases. Inclusion criteria were articles focused on the usability evaluation of mHealth apps designed for older adults. The included studies were classified according to the mHealth app usability evaluation framework, and the suitability of evaluation methods for use among the elderly was analyzed. Results Ninety-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Research activity increased steeply after 2013 (n = 92). Satisfaction (n = 74) and learnability (n = 60) were the most frequently evaluated critical measures, while memorability (n = 13) was the least evaluated. The ratios of satisfaction, learnability, operability, and understandability measures were significantly related to the different stages of evaluation (P < 0.05). The methods used for usability evaluation were questionnaire (n = 68), interview (n = 36), concurrent thinking aloud (n = 25), performance metrics (n = 25), behavioral observation log (n = 14), screen recording (n = 3), eye tracking (n = 1), retrospective thinking aloud (n = 1), and feedback log (n = 1). Thirty-two studies developed their own evaluation tool to assess unique design features for elderly individuals. Conclusion In the past five years, the number of studies in the field of usability evaluation of mHealth apps for the elderly has increased rapidly. The mHealth apps are often used as an auxiliary means of self-management to help the elderly manage their wellness and disease. According to the three stages of the mHealth app usability evaluation framework, the critical measures and evaluation methods are inconsistent. Future research should focus on selecting specific critical measures relevant to aging characteristics and adapting usability evaluation methods to elderly individuals by improving traditional tools, introducing automated evaluation tools and optimizing evaluation processes.

Designing Mobile Health Applications to Support Walking for Older Adults

“…In current mobile health applications, physical activity is measured mainly by quantitative measures (e.g., steps, distance, duration) [ 28 , 29 , 54 ]. Similarly, in our probe, we presented users with the distance and duration of the walks.…”

“…As with younger adults, mobile technologies have the potential to support and enhance physical activity for older adults. However, despite the variety of products and the benefit the older population may have from mobile health technologies, their adoption rate has been relatively low, and over 43% of people aged 70 years old and above quit using mobile health technology after only 14 days [ 29 ]. According to Tajudeen et al [ 30 ], this happens due to complicated features and menus as well as interface designs that do not take into consideration the older population.…”

Nursing Informatics' Contribution to One Health

“…There is a need for a broader focus across the continuum of care and integration into EHR systems [24]. Other examples of technologies used by nurses in practice include mHealth apps [25], telehealth solutions [26], and applications of the Internet of Things [27], to name but a few.…”

Interviews with HIV Experts for Development of a Mobile Health Application in HIV Care—A Qualitative Study

“…In addition, technical integration into the electronic health record (EHR) needs to be available in order to facilitate patient-centered care [21][22][23]. However, a further success factor for such apps is a high rate of usability and acceptance by the users [24][25][26][27]. A study by Raeesi et al indicated that HIV/AIDS apps often do not meet user requirements [28].…”