2015
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1079653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability test of a hand exoskeleton for activities of daily living: an example of user-centered design

Abstract: The findings demonstrate that although Handexos meets the initial functional requirements and underlines the potential for assisting SCI and post-stroke subjects in ADLs, several aspects such as mechanical complexity and low adaptability to different hand sizes need to be further addressed. Implications for Rehabilitation Wearable robotics devices could improve the activities of daily living in patients with spinal cord injury or stroke. They could be a tool for rehabilitation of the upper limb. Further usabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests that wearing an exoskeletal robot is inevitably time consuming and may require the help of others. The same problem that patients who manifested spasticity in fingers, hands and forearms had difficulty wearing hand exoskeletons by themselves also was observed in previous study (Almenara et al, 2017). It is one of the major problems in the design of rehabilitation exoskeleton robots and will be the major line of inquiry in future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This finding suggests that wearing an exoskeletal robot is inevitably time consuming and may require the help of others. The same problem that patients who manifested spasticity in fingers, hands and forearms had difficulty wearing hand exoskeletons by themselves also was observed in previous study (Almenara et al, 2017). It is one of the major problems in the design of rehabilitation exoskeleton robots and will be the major line of inquiry in future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The objectives of this study were to explore users’ perceptions about existing wearable robotic devices for upper extremity, to identify if there was a need to design and develop new devices for upper extremity, and to describe different factors that might affect the design of new devices and thus the required features for these devices. Earlier studies have investigated user’s perception regarding specific robotic devices for upper extremity [ 34 ]; however, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore users’ perceptions regarding wearable robotic devices for the upper extremity generally, rather than being limited to a specific device. The study findings describe the perspectives of therapists and people with stroke who had previous experience with different upper extremity devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several other studies, user involvement has been shown to improve usability and acceptability of new devices [ 53 , 54 ]. In addition, usability tests can also be beneficial in identifying problems with existing devices [ 55 ]. In our study, we observed similar benefits, as the orthotists and individuals with SCI transitioned from “users” to “designers.” The impact of human-centered design was also seen through the improvement of average scores for the 3D-printed WDO as a result of incorporating feedback received during user testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%