2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijht.2018.090285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usable technology for the differently abled-hearing impairment

Abstract: Abstract:Hearing loss poses a serious challenge to access information that are in the form of audio or video on the internet. Text subtitles or closed captioning is a popular mechanism to make the audio embedded in the videos accessible to the hearing impaired. Alternatively, a sign language interpreter may translate the audio into sign language gestures. However, these aids are either expensive or technologically infeasible. In this paper, we propose a technique to enable a person with hearing impairment see … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This design facilitates ease of updates and maintenance, allowing each module to be refined without disrupting the system's overall functionality. Performance evaluation, the cornerstone of this phase, is conducted through a series of methodical tests designed to gauge the system's accuracy, responsiveness, and adaptability [32]. The accuracy of object recognition and scene analysis algorithms is quantified using standard metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score.…”
Section: Implementation and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This design facilitates ease of updates and maintenance, allowing each module to be refined without disrupting the system's overall functionality. Performance evaluation, the cornerstone of this phase, is conducted through a series of methodical tests designed to gauge the system's accuracy, responsiveness, and adaptability [32]. The accuracy of object recognition and scene analysis algorithms is quantified using standard metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score.…”
Section: Implementation and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%