USAFA Faculty Homepage: Extending the U.S. Air Force Academy's Cadet Homepage for the Faculty & Staff

Abstract

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

Quantifying intuition: Bayesian approach to figures of merit in EXAFS analysis of magic size clusters

“…Recovering atomic structure of MSCs puts particularly stringent demands on model comparison in EXAFS because local atomic arrangements can be quite similar. 9 When theoretical and experimental spectra are compared, in most EXAFS analysis programs (such as Artemis 10 and Larch 11 ) there are a number of figures of merit (FoMs) available to provide quantitative model evaluation to answer the question of whether the model is a suitable match for the experimental data. However, none of the commonly used FoMs take into account parameter correlation.…”