2011
DOI: 10.14429/djlit.31.6.1318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usage of Electronic Resources at Dr T.P.M. Library, Madurai Kamaraj University: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to research showing that students prefer printed sources, a number of studies, especially those published in the past few years, indicate that students are more inclined to use electronic resources (Agboola, 2010;Harrington, 2009;Holaday, Selvig, Purkiss, & Hortsch, 2013;Ji et al, 2014;Pandita, 2012;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Thanuskodi, 2011;Uçak, 2007). The students emphasize ease of use, search, and access to information (Arya & Talukdar, 2010;Beard, Dale, & Hutchins, 2007;Kandpal et al, 2013;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Sudhier & Seethalekshmi, 2011;Uçak, 2007), recency of information (Pandita, 2012;Porumbeanu, 2009;Shelburne, 2009;Sudhier & Seethalekshmi, 2011;Sujatha & Mudhol, 2008;Uçak, 2007), availability of resources (Shelburne, 2009), access to a wide range of information (Beard et al, 2007;Pandita, 2012;Porumbeanu, 2009;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012), saving time (Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Shelburne, 2009;Sujatha & Mudhol, 2008), and reducing costs (Hernon et al, 2007;Ji et al, 2014).…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Of Electronic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to research showing that students prefer printed sources, a number of studies, especially those published in the past few years, indicate that students are more inclined to use electronic resources (Agboola, 2010;Harrington, 2009;Holaday, Selvig, Purkiss, & Hortsch, 2013;Ji et al, 2014;Pandita, 2012;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Thanuskodi, 2011;Uçak, 2007). The students emphasize ease of use, search, and access to information (Arya & Talukdar, 2010;Beard, Dale, & Hutchins, 2007;Kandpal et al, 2013;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Sudhier & Seethalekshmi, 2011;Uçak, 2007), recency of information (Pandita, 2012;Porumbeanu, 2009;Shelburne, 2009;Sudhier & Seethalekshmi, 2011;Sujatha & Mudhol, 2008;Uçak, 2007), availability of resources (Shelburne, 2009), access to a wide range of information (Beard et al, 2007;Pandita, 2012;Porumbeanu, 2009;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012), saving time (Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Shelburne, 2009;Sujatha & Mudhol, 2008), and reducing costs (Hernon et al, 2007;Ji et al, 2014).…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Of Electronic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Students from developed countries are generally confident that they possess the equipment necessary for effective access to and use of electronic resources (Ji et al, 2014;Nikolopoulou & Gialamas, 2011). In contrast, students from less developed countries often point out the problem of inadequate ICT infrastructure (Agboola, 2010;Boumarafi, 2010;Dadzie, 2005;Hadagali, Kumbar, Nelogal, & Bachalapur, 2012;Manda, 2005;Okello-Obura, 2010;Thanuskodi, 2011). However, for the effective use of electronic resources it is not enough to have a powerful computer and fast Internet access; it is also necessary to have specific knowledge and skills.…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Of Electronic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…digital libraries and data bases) (Thanuskodi, 2011) In the current study, in order to understand faculty members' acceptance of and attitudes toward the implementation of LMSs in their teaching practice, the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) (Hall & Hord, 1987) was used. The CBAM has been used extensively to examine the acceptance and integration of technology in educational settings (Newhouse, 2001;Butler, 2010;Sultana, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers need to be informed of the high quality free internet resources and how to access them (Sampath Kumar and Kumar, 2010). Thanuskodi (2011) identified that M.Phil. student respondents took the first position in their overall methods of searching e‐resources, postgraduate student respondents the second position, PhD scholar respondents the last position.…”
Section: Age and Position Related Usementioning
confidence: 99%