2012 IEEE 10th Jubilee International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2012
DOI: 10.1109/sisy.2012.6339526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usage of SOA and BPM changes the roles and the way of thinking in development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While multiple contributions discuss governance aspects for pairwise integration scenarios, we identified a lack of concepts for a holistic integration of SOA, BPM, and BRM (i. a. Selmeci and Orosz, 2012; Trkman et al , 2011; Becker et al , 2011). Consequently, we identify future research potentials of Type 1, which call for a combination of those domain-specific concepts.…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While multiple contributions discuss governance aspects for pairwise integration scenarios, we identified a lack of concepts for a holistic integration of SOA, BPM, and BRM (i. a. Selmeci and Orosz, 2012; Trkman et al , 2011; Becker et al , 2011). Consequently, we identify future research potentials of Type 1, which call for a combination of those domain-specific concepts.…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model can be considered as hybrid, combining views from the top-down and bottom-up approaches, like the Selmeci et al (2012) work. Although actions start from the BPM level and services discovery is triggered as a result of BPs decomposition (like in Patricia et al (2011)), there is an important concern about the services themselves, similarly to Shankararaman et al (2011) work.…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…field concatenation, trimming, splitting are necessary for the different receiver components). [14] The table 2 summarizes the capabilities of the selected and observed ERP systems in the cross-system workflow arena we can see the following communication options in high level. 3.…”
Section: Cross-system Workflows and Business Process Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%