Use and Utility: Exploring the Diversity and Design of Water Models at the Science-Policy Interface

Abstract

Effort to narrow the gap between the production and use of scientific knowledge for environmental decision-making is gaining traction, yet in practice, supply and demand remains largely unbalanced. A qualitative study based on empirical analysis offers a novel approach to exploring key factors, focussing on seven water models in the context of two organisations at the science-policy interface: the PIREN-Seine in France and the CRC for Water Sensitive Cities in Australia. Tentative linkages drawn from these examples identify: (1) objective and expertise; (2) knowledge and tools; and (3) support structures as main drivers influencing the production of scientific knowledge which, in turn, affect the use and utility of modelling tools. Further insight is gained by highlighting the wide spectrum of uses and utilities existing in practice, suggesting that such 'boundary organisations' facilitate interactions and exchanges that give added value to scientific knowledge. Coordinated strategies that integrate inter-, extra-, and intra-boundary activities, framed through collaborative scenario building and the use of interactive modelling platforms, may offer ways to enhance the use and utility of scientific knowledge (and its tools) to better support water resources management, policy and planning decisions, thus promoting a more cohesive relationship between science and policy.

Enhancing science-policy interface in marine environmental governance: Oil spill response models as boundary objects in the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea

“…Models that are "too" complex, therefore, may alienate the different stakeholders from each other rather than bringing them closer together. Usable models would need to be sufficiently complex to represent the system in an adequate manner but still remain accessible to non-expert users [13].…”

“…Scientific models provide both researchers and end-users, e.g. practitioners and policymakers, with new insight and deeper understanding of environmental phenomena, while also supporting management and policymaking [1,12,13]. Models are often considered as static, instrumental, tools that provide technical solutions to specific pre-determined problems in a linear manner, i.e.…”

River Basin Visions: Tools and Approaches from Yesterday to Tomorrow

“…However, the tools themselves largely remain in the hands of researchers or practitioners with modelling expertise [24]. Only researchers have the ability to operate the model and change its code, while partners operate the model without being able to make changes in the code or benefit from the knowledge produced by modelling without operating the model or directly using its outputs.…”

When salient science is not enough to advance climate change adaptation: Lessons from Brazil and Australia

“…What can be gleaned from both bodies of literature is the need for more empirical evidence that sheds light on what underpins the usability and usefulness of the information generated through boundary organisations and for whom (Chong et al 2017). This means that generating knowledge or information that is salient, or useful and relevant (cf.…”