Use of a chart audit: teaching well child care to paediatric house officers

Abstract

A prospective study employing a randomly assigned control group was conducted to assess the usefulness of a chart audit in teaching paediatric residents the components of well child care. The charts of children less than 5 years of age were reviewed and compared with audit criteria. Per cent compliance scores were calculated for five categories: present history; behaviour-development; family history; past medical history; and physical assessment. Five separate audits (10 charts per resident per audit) were conducted--two prior to giving the residents feedback, one after informing them that a study was being conducted, once a month after giving feedback, and one a year later. There was no significant difference between the baseline scores of the two groups. In addition, there were no significant changes in the experimental group's scores during the first three audits or the control group's scores over the whole 3-year course of the study. However, one month after receiving feedback, the scores of the experimental group improved significantly in present history, behaviour-development, and past history. One year later, the experimental group's scores were lower in every category than in the preceding audit. However, their scores were higher than the control group and the difference reached statistical significance in present history. We conclude that regular chart audits with feedback are a valuable addition to the primary care curriculum in a paediatric residency programme.

Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABC<SUP>TM</SUP>s of benchmarking

“…Improving process of care means changing provider behaviour. Studies do show that providing feedback of provider-specific data, either retrospectively or continuously, does, at least in the short term, change behaviour modestly (Rhyne & Gehlbach 1979;McDonald et al 1984;Winickoff et al 1984;Meyer et al 1991;Mayefsky & Foye 1993;Cohen et al 1994;Nelson et al 1995;Oxman et al 1995;Goebel 1997). In our own work, as described above, we use the provider profile approach for feedback and dissemination through confidential letters to the providers.…”

Educating the Health Community

“…A literature review as well as experienced local and national consultants warned us about the considerable challenges in getting the attention of PCPs and in changing their behavior (Bennett, Guralnick, Richardson, & Heiser, 1983;Dobos, Dworkin, & Bernstein, 1994;Greco & Eisenberg, 1993;Guralnick, Heiser, Eaton, Bennett, Richardson, Groom, 1988;Guralnick, Bennet, Heiser, Richardson, Shibley, 1987;Mayefsky & Foye, 1993;Phillips, Friedman, Zebal, 1984;Smith, Singleton, Hilton, 1998;Tierney, Hui, McDonald, 1986). Our Advisors were quite undaunted by this evidence.…”

Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: From Evidence to Application

“…69 Only one study 40 reported concealment of allocation, three studies 40,68,70 reported complete follow-up, and one study 67 reported blinded assessment of the outcomes. Analogous to the interventions described above, these RCTs predominantly took place in primary care settings and were not related to antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy.…”