1980
DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(80)90049-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a conditioned stimulus to study whether the initiation of electrical pre-slaughter stunning is painful

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The humaneness of stunning has been widely investigated and many researchers have concluded that when applied correctly, stunning is a humane procedure (Cook et al 1993; Leach et al 1980;Daly and Simmons 1994;Blackmore 1979;Daly et al 1985, Lambooij 1980) and on this scientific evidence it has become a legal requirement, for the protection of animal welfare, in very many countries around the world. As such, proponents of stunning for Halal slaughter therefore emphasise the need for any stunning method approved for Halal slaughter to be humane (MS1500 2009; MUI HAS 23103 2012; HFA 2014).…”
Section: Pre-slaughter Stunning May Not Be a Humane Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The humaneness of stunning has been widely investigated and many researchers have concluded that when applied correctly, stunning is a humane procedure (Cook et al 1993; Leach et al 1980;Daly and Simmons 1994;Blackmore 1979;Daly et al 1985, Lambooij 1980) and on this scientific evidence it has become a legal requirement, for the protection of animal welfare, in very many countries around the world. As such, proponents of stunning for Halal slaughter therefore emphasise the need for any stunning method approved for Halal slaughter to be humane (MS1500 2009; MUI HAS 23103 2012; HFA 2014).…”
Section: Pre-slaughter Stunning May Not Be a Humane Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An animal that Is prepared to forego a given amount of food (deprivation of which Is known to cause weight loss and deterioration of physical condition) to avoid a particular treatment would most likely suffer If It were forced to undergo that treatment. This assumption can be used to answer some of the most important questions concerning animal welfare, such as whether preslaughter stunning Is painful (Leach et al 1980), and how much animals suffer from the various experimental procedures they are subjected to in laboratories.…”
Section: = Awereionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calves may revive even if they are bled immediately after conventional electric stunning. In sheep and pigs, bleeding should take place within 10 to 17 seconds after conventional stunning to insure that the animals do not return to sensibility (Lambooy 1982;Blackmore and Newhook 1981;Leach 1978). In pigs, the absolute maximum allowable interval is 30 seconds (Hoenderken 1978a).…”
Section: Insensibility Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%