2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00132-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a delayed non-matching to position task to model age-dependent cognitive decline in the dog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possibly a more important reason for the diversity in reversal learning data is individual differences associated with aging. Our studies of cognitive aging in beagle dogs have indicated that individual variability in cognitive performance increases with age such that at least three distinct populations of aged dogs can be identified: those that are severely cognitively impaired, those that show mild impairments, and those that perform at levels similar to those of young dogs (Milgram et al 1994;Head et al 1995;Cummings et al 1996a,b;Adams et al 2000a;Head et al 2001;Siwak et al 2002). To account for this age-associated increase in cognitive variability, the present study separated aged dogs into two distinct groups based on chronological age.…”
Section: Tapp Et Almentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Possibly a more important reason for the diversity in reversal learning data is individual differences associated with aging. Our studies of cognitive aging in beagle dogs have indicated that individual variability in cognitive performance increases with age such that at least three distinct populations of aged dogs can be identified: those that are severely cognitively impaired, those that show mild impairments, and those that perform at levels similar to those of young dogs (Milgram et al 1994;Head et al 1995;Cummings et al 1996a,b;Adams et al 2000a;Head et al 2001;Siwak et al 2002). To account for this age-associated increase in cognitive variability, the present study separated aged dogs into two distinct groups based on chronological age.…”
Section: Tapp Et Almentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Procedural learning and memory, as well as simple discrimination learning, are generally insensitive to aging (Milgram et al 1994). By contrast, tests of executive function, such as discrimination reversal learning (Milgram et al 1994;Tapp et al 2003a), and working memory (Adams et al 2000b;Head et al 1995), such as a delayednonmatching-to-position (DNMP) task (Chan et al 2002), are highly sensitive to aging. In other instances, age sensitivity depends on prior test experience.…”
Section: Age-associated Cognitive Decline In Dogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a cross-sectional approach, we have established that tasks dependent on frontal lobe function, in particular tests of executive function (Milgram et al 1994;Tapp et al 2003a) and visuospatial working memory (Chan et al 2002), are notably sensitive to age (Adams et al 2000b;Head et al 1995). In a study of 109 dogs (manuscript in preparation), a statistically significant impairment in both acquisition of the DNMP using a 5-s delay and memory capacity were detected as early as six years of age (Figure 1) (Araujo 2004;Araujo et al 2004a).…”
Section: Age-associated Cognitive Decline In Dogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By means of a cognitive test apparatus (a canine adaptation of the Wisconsin General Test Apparatus) all laboratory behavioral tests (such as the object recognition memory task, delayed-non-matching-to-position task, delayed-non-matching-to-sample test), are conducted using food as a reward to motivate learning in the animal [83][84][85][86]. Aging dogs (mostly beagles) are diagnosed with substantial cognitive decline when they present reduced capacity in the learning of tasks such as object recognition memory [83], visuospatial learning and memory [87,88], allocentric spatial function [86], discrimination learning and discrimination reversal learning [89]. From all these studies two main conclusions have emerged: a) the detection of canine cognitive dysfunction depends on the cognitive process engaged, on the task used and on the relative level of difficulty; and b) the variability in the cognitive abilities of dogs increases with age.…”
Section: Behavioral Assessment Of Housed Dogsmentioning
confidence: 99%