Use of a formal consensus development technique to produce recommendations for improving the effectiveness of adult mental health multidisciplinary team meetings

Abstract

BackgroundMultidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are the core mechanism for delivering mental health care but it is unclear which models improve care quality. The aim of the study was to agree recommendations for improving the effectiveness of adult mental health MDT meetings, based on national guidance, research evidence and experiential insights from mental health and other medical specialties.MethodsWe established an expert panel of 16 health care professionals, policy-makers and patient representatives. Five panellists had experience in a range of adult mental health services, five in heart failure services and six in cancer services. Panellists privately rated 68 potential recommendations on a scale of one to nine, and re-rated them after panel discussion using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to determine consensus.ResultsWe obtained agreement (median ≥ 7) and low variation in extent of agreement (Mean Absolute Deviation from Median of ≤1.11) for 21 recommendations. These included the explicit agreement and auditing of MDT meeting objectives, and the documentation and monitoring of treatment plan implementation.ConclusionsFormal consensus development methods that involved learning across specialities led to feasible recommendations for improved MDT meeting effectiveness in a wide range of settings. Our findings may be used by adult mental health teams to reflect on their practice and facilitate improvement. In some other contexts, the recommendations will require modification. For example, in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, context-specific issues such as the role of carers should be taken into account. A limitation of the comparative approach adopted was that only five members of the panel of 16 experts were mental health specialists.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0534-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The impact of Clinical Nurse Specialists on the decision making process in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study

“…This research was conducted as part of a larger mixed methods study of chronic disease MDT meetings (the MDT study), which sought to identify the characteristics of MDT meetings associated with decision implementation (Raine et al, 2015, Raine et al 2014a, Raine et al, 2014b. The MDT study involved multiple researchers collecting, coding and analysing data from 12 MDTs in cancer, heart failure, mental health and memory clinic teams.…”

Assessing Learning Needs and Career Attitudes of Italian Psychiatry Residents: Results from a National Survey Conducted by the Italian Society of Psychopathology Young Psychiatrists Section (SOPSI-GG)

“…For these reasons, in planning vocational training, it should be taken into account to provide multidisciplinary, theoretical and practical updates, addressed to different professional categories. This would allow a continuous exchange and interaction between different operators, following the fundamental principles of the integrated care in psychiatry: working in a multidisciplinary team and integrating different expertise when planning and providing therapeutic interventions [29, 30].…”

Using a theory driven approach to develop and evaluate a complex mental health intervention: the friendship bench project in Zimbabwe

“…We therefore ran the ToC in groups that were less hierarchical based on these dynamics. This formal consensus development method which involved learning across disciplines has been described as yielding effective results in multidisciplinary mental health teams [ 32 ], through the collective selection of strategies that can be applied to promote change [ 31 ].…”