2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01040.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a generalised linear model to test habitat preferences: the example of Zingel asper, an endemic endangered percid of the River Rhône

Abstract: SUMMARY 1. A study of microhabitat preferences was conducted on Zingel asper, an endangered endemic species from the Rhône catchment. A generalised linear model allowed us to test statistically the non‐random habitat selection and the effect of season and site on this habitat selection. 2. The analysis detected significant preferences for the three physical variables considered: water depth, water velocity and substratum size. 3. A seasonal shift in the substratum size preference was found: preference for ston… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Austin and Myers, 1996;Cairns, 2001;Cawsey et al, 2002;Yee and Mackenzie, 2002) and applications of GLMs to aquatic habitat modelling are limited. Labonne et al (2003) applied GLMs for analyzing fish-habitat relationships in the Beaume river. The main conclusion was that GLMs can be used as effective tools for the analysis of aquatic habitat-species relationship, especially when the assumptions of simpler methods cannot be justified.…”
Section: Generalized Linear Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austin and Myers, 1996;Cairns, 2001;Cawsey et al, 2002;Yee and Mackenzie, 2002) and applications of GLMs to aquatic habitat modelling are limited. Labonne et al (2003) applied GLMs for analyzing fish-habitat relationships in the Beaume river. The main conclusion was that GLMs can be used as effective tools for the analysis of aquatic habitat-species relationship, especially when the assumptions of simpler methods cannot be justified.…”
Section: Generalized Linear Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation is that evaluations of the habitat structure of spawning aggregation sites have been largely qualitative descriptions and have not involved a quantitative comparison with habitat attributes in non-spawning sites. Much work has been done to determine the habitat attributes underlying spawning site selection in freshwater fishes by quantitatively comparing spawning and non-spawning sites (Baxter & Hauer 2000, Labonne et al 2003 and some marine fishes (Kroon et al 2000, Sancho et al 2000b). There is a great potential for applying the same approach to test hypotheses about the importance of habitat structure in the selection of spawning aggregation sites by reef fishes.…”
Section: Habitat Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little is known about its biology in general and its early development in particular. Demography and habitat preferences at various scales have been documented by several authors (Labonne et al, 2003;Labonne and Gaudin, 2005;Danancher et al, 2004). Working on the Durance population, Cavalli et al (2003) studied the impact of diet on growth patterns, and used the first scale measurement in Z. asper.…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%