1986
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-132-11-2977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a lacZ Gene Fusion to Determine the Dependence Pattern and the Spore Compartment Expression of Sporulation Operon spoVA in spo Mutants of Bacillus subtilis

Abstract: A spo V A A : : lac2 gene fusion has been used to study expression of the spo V A operon during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. fl-Galactosidase activity, encoded by the fusion gene, begins to be produced about 2.5 h after the induction of sporulation, well before the phenotypic consequences of spoVA mutations are manifested. spoVA expression is dependent on all of the known sp00 and spoII loci and on some of the 'early' spoIII loci, but not on 'later' loci. Several lines of evidence suggest that spoVA expre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…that RNA polymerase purified from the spolIIG deletion mutant is still able to transcribe sspE in vitro (with at least 25% of the activity of the wild-type enzyme} despite the complete absence of expression of the sspE-lacZ fusion in that strain. Finally, it should be noted that mutations in many loci (spolIB, spolIE, spoHG, spolIIA) abolish sspE expression (Mason et al 1988b) but do not interfere with the expression of the spolIA operon (Errington and Mandelstam 1986a), indicating that a F synthesis cannot promote sspE expression in vivo by itself. The simplest explanation for these discrepancies between the in vivo and in vitro results is to assume that the promoter recognition properties of a F and a c, the actual a-factor for sspE (see belowl, are very similar.…”
Section: O ~ Is Not Involved In Sspe Transcription In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…that RNA polymerase purified from the spolIIG deletion mutant is still able to transcribe sspE in vitro (with at least 25% of the activity of the wild-type enzyme} despite the complete absence of expression of the sspE-lacZ fusion in that strain. Finally, it should be noted that mutations in many loci (spolIB, spolIE, spoHG, spolIIA) abolish sspE expression (Mason et al 1988b) but do not interfere with the expression of the spolIA operon (Errington and Mandelstam 1986a), indicating that a F synthesis cannot promote sspE expression in vivo by itself. The simplest explanation for these discrepancies between the in vivo and in vitro results is to assume that the promoter recognition properties of a F and a c, the actual a-factor for sspE (see belowl, are very similar.…”
Section: O ~ Is Not Involved In Sspe Transcription In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strains carrying various ssp-lacZ gene fusions were constructed as described previously (Mason et al 1988b). Phage O105 carrying a spoVA-lacZ fusion was obtained from J. Errington and was transduced in various strains, as indicated by Errington and Mandelstam (1986b).…”
Section: Stratus and Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm. ); div355 (Levin and Losick 1994); divIC⍀pPL27 (Levin and Losick 1994); spoIIE48 (Errington and Mandelstam 1986;Barak et al 1996); dacF::spoIIAA+ (Alper 1996); dacF::spoIIAA(S58A) ; amyE::sspE(2G)-gfp ; amyE::gfp-spoIVA (Price and Losick 1999). Preparation of competent cells and transformation were performed as described in Cutting and Horn (1990).…”
Section: Strain Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dashed underlining and Roman numerals indicate the regions of nucleotide conservation between the two species of Bacillus. P-galactosidase activity is detectable at T3 and much increased at T4 and T5 (Errington & Mandelstam, 1986).] Experiments with each primer clearly showed only a single transcript, which appeared from its length to have its 5' end at the second nucleotide in region IV shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…subtilis lies another sporulation locus, spo VA. There are several reasons for believing that in B. subtilis spoVA is transcribed separately from spoIIA : first, experiments with integrational plasmid vectors suggest that the two loci belong to different transcriptional units ; secondly, the sequence immediately downstream of spoIIA includes what appears to be a terminator of transcription (Wu et al, 1989;Yudkin et al, 1989); thirdly, results of experiments with fusions of spoVA to lac2 show that spoVA is expressed much later in sporulation than spoIIA (Errington & Mandelstam, 1986); fourthly, expression of spoVA, unlike that of spoIIA, must take place in, and is confined to, the prespore compartment (Errington & Mandelstam, 1986 ;Gholamhoseinian & Piggot, 1989); fifthly, the size of spoIIA mRNA estimated from Northern blots agrees with that predicted for a tricistronic spoIIA message (Savva & Mandelstam, 1986). We now describe experiments whose results have identified the startpoint of transcription of spoVA, and show that the spoVA promoter, which is identical in sequence in B. subtilis and B. lichenformis, resembles promoters that are known to be recognized by RNA polymerase containing aG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%