2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a nerve stimulator does not improve the efficacy of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve blocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Our success rate of 94.2% is comparable to other studies using a combination of ultrasound and nerve stimulation techniques. 1,2,22 However, despite the high success rate, we did have over a 5% failure rate for complete surgical block attainment. We suspect that many factors could have contributed to these failures, such as inadequate local anesthetic spread, patient body habitus, and local anesthetic soakage time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…21 Our success rate of 94.2% is comparable to other studies using a combination of ultrasound and nerve stimulation techniques. 1,2,22 However, despite the high success rate, we did have over a 5% failure rate for complete surgical block attainment. We suspect that many factors could have contributed to these failures, such as inadequate local anesthetic spread, patient body habitus, and local anesthetic soakage time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks are beneficial because of their rapid onset time and predictable anesthesia. Yet, whether the blocks are ultrasound-guided (85-95%) [1][2][3][4] or nerve stimulation-located (72-97%), 5-7 current evidence indicates variable success rates. These blocks have also been associated with pneumothorax 8,9 and procedural difficulty in patients where landmark-based techniques can be inadequate [e.g., high body mass index (BMI) or anatomical variation].…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may further decrease the likelihood of catheter advancement away from the tract formed by the injected dextrose solution, thereby improving the ease of catheter insertion (Niazi et al, 2009). To date, however, the need for electro-stimulation in addition to ultrasound guidance remains controversial, especially for lower extremity perineural catheter placement (Chan et al, 2007;Walker & Roberts, 2007;Beach et al, 2006;Gürkan et al, 2008;Dingemans et al, 2007). Moreover combining ultrasound with electro-stimulation does negate any cost advantages attributed to ultrasound guidance alone (Sandhu et al, 2004).…”
Section: An Alternative: Ultrasonographic Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%