Abstract:Summary
Horses with enterolithiasis may develop clinical signs of colic due to partial or complete obstruction of the right dorsal, transverse or small colon. Laparotomy followed by enterotomy at the site of obstruction or mobilisation of enteroliths to intestinal segments deemed more appropriate for incision is indicated in these cases. However, surgical removal of enteroliths lodged in nonexteriorisable intestinal segments and/or not amenable to mobilisation may be labour intensive and dangerous. Pneumatic i… Show more
“…In another report of surgical management of enterolithiasis, mean surgery time was 128 ± 31 min (range 70-200 min) with 13% requiring 1 enterotomy, 83% of surgeries requiring 2 enterotomies and 4% requiring 3 enterotomies (Torrent Crosa et al, 2020). In this case series, mean surgery time was 135 min (range 120-145 min) with 4 cases requiring 1 enterotomy and 1 case requiring 2 enterotomies (Machado Amaral Rosa et al, 2023). This suggests that while the time advantage of pneumatic lithotripsy for enterolithiasis proposed by Machado Amaral Rosa et al (2023) may not be as profound as described.…”
Section: Appli C Ati On Of Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In this case series, mean surgery time was 135 min (range 120-145 min) with 4 cases requiring 1 enterotomy and 1 case requiring 2 enterotomies (Machado Amaral Rosa et al, 2023). This suggests that while the time advantage of pneumatic lithotripsy for enterolithiasis proposed by Machado Amaral Rosa et al (2023) may not be as profound as described.…”
Section: Appli C Ati On Of Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…An ex vivo study comparing lithotripsy damage on urinary tract tissue found that tissue damage and risk of perforation was affected by the type of lithotripter, tissue type, probe force and duration of contact between probe and tissue (Sarkissian et al, 2015). While it is not known how this information extrapolates to equine intestine, equine surgeon experience is likely to be limited with this technique and it is important to be as careful when using pneumatic lithotripsy as the authors of this case series emphasise (Machado Amaral Rosa et al, 2023).…”
Section: Appli C Ati On Of Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Machado Amaral Rosa et al (2023) stated that advantages of their pneumatic lithotripsy technique for the management of enteroliths include ability to use smaller enterotomies through sites that are remote to the site of obstruction and reduced surgical time. Comparisons for surgery time were made to an isolated case report describing a particularly difficult presentation of obstructive enterolithiasis (Barrett & Munsterman, 2013).…”
Section: Appli C Ati On Of Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pneumatic lithotripsy as described in this case series (Machado Amaral Rosa et al, 2023) is a useful tool for the surgeon to have in their toolbox when presented with obstructive enterolithiasis.…”
Enteroliths, faecaliths, ingested foreign bodies and bezoars are examples of focal intraluminal obstructions that can lodge in inaccessible parts of the gastrointestinal tract (Hanson & Schumacher, 2021;
“…In another report of surgical management of enterolithiasis, mean surgery time was 128 ± 31 min (range 70-200 min) with 13% requiring 1 enterotomy, 83% of surgeries requiring 2 enterotomies and 4% requiring 3 enterotomies (Torrent Crosa et al, 2020). In this case series, mean surgery time was 135 min (range 120-145 min) with 4 cases requiring 1 enterotomy and 1 case requiring 2 enterotomies (Machado Amaral Rosa et al, 2023). This suggests that while the time advantage of pneumatic lithotripsy for enterolithiasis proposed by Machado Amaral Rosa et al (2023) may not be as profound as described.…”
Section: Appli C Ati On Of Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In this case series, mean surgery time was 135 min (range 120-145 min) with 4 cases requiring 1 enterotomy and 1 case requiring 2 enterotomies (Machado Amaral Rosa et al, 2023). This suggests that while the time advantage of pneumatic lithotripsy for enterolithiasis proposed by Machado Amaral Rosa et al (2023) may not be as profound as described.…”
Section: Appli C Ati On Of Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…An ex vivo study comparing lithotripsy damage on urinary tract tissue found that tissue damage and risk of perforation was affected by the type of lithotripter, tissue type, probe force and duration of contact between probe and tissue (Sarkissian et al, 2015). While it is not known how this information extrapolates to equine intestine, equine surgeon experience is likely to be limited with this technique and it is important to be as careful when using pneumatic lithotripsy as the authors of this case series emphasise (Machado Amaral Rosa et al, 2023).…”
Section: Appli C Ati On Of Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Machado Amaral Rosa et al (2023) stated that advantages of their pneumatic lithotripsy technique for the management of enteroliths include ability to use smaller enterotomies through sites that are remote to the site of obstruction and reduced surgical time. Comparisons for surgery time were made to an isolated case report describing a particularly difficult presentation of obstructive enterolithiasis (Barrett & Munsterman, 2013).…”
Section: Appli C Ati On Of Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pneumatic lithotripsy as described in this case series (Machado Amaral Rosa et al, 2023) is a useful tool for the surgeon to have in their toolbox when presented with obstructive enterolithiasis.…”
Enteroliths, faecaliths, ingested foreign bodies and bezoars are examples of focal intraluminal obstructions that can lodge in inaccessible parts of the gastrointestinal tract (Hanson & Schumacher, 2021;
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.