2004
DOI: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of a preprinted sticker to improve the prescribing of prophylactic antibiotics for hip fracture surgery

Abstract: Problem: Antibiotic prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the number of postoperative infections following surgery for hip fracture. At Auckland Hospital the policy for antibiotic prophylaxis for hip fracture surgery is for the patient to receive the first dose of antibiotic at the induction of anaesthesia followed by two more doses at 8 hour intervals. A previous audit found that patients often received too many doses of antibiotic. A retrospective audit was performed of 100 patients undergoing surgery for a h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 15 Pre-printed chart stickers improve compliance with prophylactic antibiotic guidelines. 16 Abolition of peak levels, contacting clinicians, education and computer ''pop-up'' screens were used to optimise vancomycin TDM in Yale University, which succeeded with a 60% decrease in TDM requests, sustained at one year. 14 Unlike the Yale study, our main aim was to improve vancomycin administration, but there was also a decrease in our TDM requests (table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 15 Pre-printed chart stickers improve compliance with prophylactic antibiotic guidelines. 16 Abolition of peak levels, contacting clinicians, education and computer ''pop-up'' screens were used to optimise vancomycin TDM in Yale University, which succeeded with a 60% decrease in TDM requests, sustained at one year. 14 Unlike the Yale study, our main aim was to improve vancomycin administration, but there was also a decrease in our TDM requests (table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%