2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-4343(01)00089-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of acoustic classification of sidescan sonar data for mapping benthic habitat in the Northern Channel Islands, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, backscatter data could not be included in the GLMs used here because there were too many unique values (n = 256) in the raw, unclassified, side scan mosaics, causing the models to crash due to limitations in computer processing power. One possible solution would be to use classified backscatter intensity as described by Cochrane & Lafferty (2002) and Intelmann & Cochrane (2006), thereby reducing the number of substrate texture classes to a more manageable range.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, backscatter data could not be included in the GLMs used here because there were too many unique values (n = 256) in the raw, unclassified, side scan mosaics, causing the models to crash due to limitations in computer processing power. One possible solution would be to use classified backscatter intensity as described by Cochrane & Lafferty (2002) and Intelmann & Cochrane (2006), thereby reducing the number of substrate texture classes to a more manageable range.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, backscatter data could not be included in the GLMs used here because there were too many unique values (n = 256) in the raw, unclassified, side scan mosaics, causing the models to crash due to limitations in computer processing power. One possible solution would be to use classified backscatter intensity as described by Cochrane & Lafferty (2002) and Intelmann & Cochrane (2006), thereby reducing the number of substrate texture classes to a more manageable range.Another potential flaw with the Sebastes elongatus model could be the small number of observations recorded for this species. Although not applied here, different methods, such as ordination, may be more suitable in situations where very few presence points exist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weaker agreements in Class II (2-mresolution grid, 51 percent accurate; 5-m-resolution grid, 49 percent accurate) and Class III (2-mresolution grid, 35 percent accurate; 5-m-resolution grid, 42 percent accurate) likely are due to (1) the distribution of small, localized rock outcrops, (2) the relatively narrow and intermittent nature of transition zones from sediment to rock, and (3) the size of the buffer. The bedrock outcrops in this area are composed of differentially eroded sedimentary rocks (Cochrane and Lafferty, 2002). Erosion of softer layers produces Class I and II sediments, resulting in patchy areas of rugose rock and boulder habitat (Class III) on the seafloor.…”
Section: By Mercedes D Erdey and Guy R Cochranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coarser sediments accumulated in seafloor depressions (Class IV) often form megaripples, which might not be always recognizable on the video footage especially when visibility is limited. Bedrock outcrops in this area are composed of differentially eroded sedimentary rocks (Cochrane and Lafferty, 2002). Erosion of softer layers produces Class I and II sediments, resulting in patchy areas of rugose rock and boulder habitat (Class III) on the seafloor.…”
Section: By Peter Dartnellmentioning
confidence: 99%