2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Adaptive Feedback in an App for English Language Spontaneous Speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, they were more willing to receive speaking feedback accordingly. However, it might be challenging for AI speech evaluation programs to provide detailed feedback such as speech content in spontaneous speaking tasks (Lehman et al, 2020). Therefore, it is indicated that AI speech evaluation programs could provide feedback on pronunciation and fluency in reading texts aloud tasks, and simultaneously give feedback for speech content in spontaneous speaking tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, they were more willing to receive speaking feedback accordingly. However, it might be challenging for AI speech evaluation programs to provide detailed feedback such as speech content in spontaneous speaking tasks (Lehman et al, 2020). Therefore, it is indicated that AI speech evaluation programs could provide feedback on pronunciation and fluency in reading texts aloud tasks, and simultaneously give feedback for speech content in spontaneous speaking tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them checked the first page of feedback which was general and straightforward, and few checked detailed feedback on the following few pages. Likewise, Lehman et al (2020) further pointed out that it was difficult for spontaneous speaking tasks to provide detailed feedback to satisfy learners' needs. However, ELAi seemed to be the only AI speech evaluation program that was investigated, and more research is needed to confirm learners' behavior in checking textual feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations