Use of Allogenic (Iliac) Corticocancellous Graft for Le Fort I Interpositional Defects: Technique and Results

Posnick, Jeffrey C.; Sami, Ali

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2014.09.002

Cited by 18 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In current clinical practice, using a sound surgical technique with rigid fixation, and interpositional grafting when indicated, the achievement of skeletal stability after osseous genioplasty is expected. 5,9,23 We agree with Troulis et al that when making measurements from lateral cephalometric radiographs, errors can be reduced if whole structures rather than individual landmarks are fitted. 27 In their study, one evaluator, at three different sittings, traced the point landmarks as well as the complete structure of the mandible and measured the linear cephalometric changes in the horizontal and vertical planes.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Allogeneic iliac corticocancellous bone was the graft material used in each case. 9 In these subjects, an additional surgeon-contoured straight titanium microplate was placed across the grafted region and then secured with screws. Four of the subjects underwent chin (pogonion) region recontouring that did not require the placement of fixation hardware.…”

Section: Need To Remove Chin Fixation Hardwarementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Osseous genioplasty in conjunction with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a review of 262 consecutive cases

Posnick

Choi

Chang

2016

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Need To Remove Chin Fixation Hardwarementioning

confidence: 99%

Osseous genioplasty in conjunction with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a review of 262 consecutive cases

Posnick

Choi

Chang

2016

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Furthermore, they conclude that C-PGA holds great promise in promoting new alveolar bone growth. Posnick and Sami (2015) examined the results of 50 patients treated with interposition grafting and Le Fort I in a 3-year timeline. It was necessary to use an interpositional graft for maxillary repositioning because horizontal advances and vertical and transverse changes had to be made.…”

Section: Chitosan Therapy In Craniofacial Diseasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The current regenerative medicine approaches of craniofacial diseases: A narrative review

Tahmasebi

Mohammadi

Alam

et al. 2023

Front. Cell Dev. Biol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Craniofacial deformities (CFDs) develop following oncological resection, trauma, or congenital disorders. Trauma is one of the top five causes of death globally, with rates varying from country to country. They result in a non-healing composite tissue wound as they degenerate in soft or hard tissues. Approximately one-third of oral diseases are caused by gum disease. Due to the complexity of anatomical structures in the region and the variety of tissue-specific requirements, CFD treatments present many challenges. Many treatment methods for CFDs are available today, such as drugs, regenerative medicine (RM), surgery, and tissue engineering. Functional restoration of a tissue or an organ after trauma or other chronic diseases is the focus of this emerging field of science. The materials and methodologies used in craniofacial reconstruction have significantly improved in the last few years. A facial fracture requires bone preservation as much as possible, so tiny fragments are removed initially. It is possible to replace bone marrow stem cells with oral stem cells for CFDs due to their excellent potential for bone formation. This review article discusses regenerative approaches for different types of craniofacial diseases.

show abstract

“…A multitude of surgical approaches have been attempted with ongoing innovation to reconstruct the resulting bony deficits of such pathologies. These include distraction osteogenesis, onlay bone grafting, interpositional block grafting, ridge splitting, alveolar sandwich osteotomy, and maxillary sinus floor elevation 5–9 . Furthermore, grafting materials of various origins continue to be explored in search of an ideal bone regenerative biomaterial to complement the aforementioned surgical techniques.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone Tissue Engineering (BTE) of the Craniofacial Skeleton, Part I: Evolution and Optimization of 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Repair of Defects

Nayak,

Slavin,

Bergamo

et al. 2023

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone tissue regeneration is a complex process that proceeds along the well-established wound healing pathway of hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Recently, tissue engineering efforts have focused on the application of biological and technological principles for the development of soft and hard tissue substitutes. Aim is directed towards boosting pathways of the healing process to restore form and function of tissue deficits. Continued development of synthetic scaffolds, cell therapies, and signaling biomolecules seeks to minimize the need for autografting. Despite being the current gold standard treatment, it is limited by donor sites’ size and shape, as well as donor site morbidity. Since the advent of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and additive manufacturing (AM) techniques (3D printing), bioengineering has expanded markedly while continuing to present innovative approaches to oral and craniofacial skeletal reconstruction. Prime examples include customizable, high-strength, load bearing, bioactive ceramic scaffolds. Porous macro- and micro-architecture along with the surface topography of 3D printed scaffolds favors osteoconduction and vascular in-growth, as well as the incorporation of stem and/or other osteoprogenitor cells and growth factors. This includes platelet concentrates (PCs), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), and some pharmacological agents, such as dipyridamole (DIPY), an adenosine A2A receptor indirect agonist that enhances osteogenic and osteoinductive capacity, thus improving bone formation. This two-part review commences by presenting current biological and engineering principles of bone regeneration utilized to produce 3D-printed ceramic scaffolds with the goal to create a viable alternative to autografts for craniofacial skeleton reconstruction. Part II comprehensively examines recent preclinical data to elucidate the potential clinical translation of such 3D-printed ceramic scaffolds.

show abstract

Use of Allogenic (Iliac) Corticocancellous Graft for Le Fort I Interpositional Defects: Technique and Results

Cited by 18 publications

References 22 publications

Osseous genioplasty in conjunction with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a review of 262 consecutive cases

Osseous genioplasty in conjunction with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a review of 262 consecutive cases

The current regenerative medicine approaches of craniofacial diseases: A narrative review

Bone Tissue Engineering (BTE) of the Craniofacial Skeleton, Part I: Evolution and Optimization of 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Repair of Defects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About