2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of an Artificial Ligament Decreases Hip Dislocation and Improves Limb Function After Total Femoral Prosthetic Replacement Following Femoral Tumor Resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Corresponding to this, Du et al investigated hip instability in 58 patients with total femoral replacement for sarcoma. 11 In 12 patients, a LARS artificial ligament was additionally wrapped spirally around the proximal end of the prosthesis, resulting in a significantly lower hip dislocation rate as compared with conventional soft tissue reconstruction. 11 Moreover, the infection rates were comparable between LARS-augmented prostheses and conventional reconstruction (8.3% vs. 10.9%; p = 0.529).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 Corresponding to this, Du et al investigated hip instability in 58 patients with total femoral replacement for sarcoma. 11 In 12 patients, a LARS artificial ligament was additionally wrapped spirally around the proximal end of the prosthesis, resulting in a significantly lower hip dislocation rate as compared with conventional soft tissue reconstruction. 11 Moreover, the infection rates were comparable between LARS-augmented prostheses and conventional reconstruction (8.3% vs. 10.9%; p = 0.529).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 In 12 patients, a LARS artificial ligament was additionally wrapped spirally around the proximal end of the prosthesis, resulting in a significantly lower hip dislocation rate as compared with conventional soft tissue reconstruction. 11 Moreover, the infection rates were comparable between LARS-augmented prostheses and conventional reconstruction (8.3% vs. 10.9%; p = 0.529). 11 These infection rates are less than the 20.0% observed by Gorter et al in 10 patients treated with push-through total femoral endoprostheses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Megaprosthesis has satisfactory short-to medium-term outcome, early mobilization and weightbearing, and short operative time; however, abductor muscles reattachment remains an issue need to be concerned. Accumulating evidence indicates using an artificial ligament to affix the megaprosthesis can promote soft-tissue reconstruction and achieve better joint stability and functional outcomes [25] . In fact, artificial ligament use is probably unable to reduce the occurrence of prosthetic complications such as aseptic loosening, prosthesis breakage, infection, and stress shielding [26] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Megaprosthesis has satisfactory short-to medium-term outcome, early mobilization and weight-bearing, and short operative time; however, abductor muscles reattachment remains an issue need to be concerned. Accumulating evidence indicates using an artificial ligament to affix the megaprosthesis can promote soft-tissue reconstruction and achieve better joint stability and functional outcomes [25] . In fact, artificial ligament use is probably unable to reduce the occurrence of prosthetic complications such as aseptic loosening, prosthesis breakage, infection, and stress shielding [26] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%