2013
DOI: 10.1159/000353188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of an Artificial Neural Network for Diagnosis of Facial Pain Syndromes: An Update

Abstract: Background: Based on a classification scheme for facial pain syndromes and a binomial (yes/no) facial pain questionnaire, we previously reported on the ability of an artificial neural network (ANN) to recognize and correctly diagnose patients with different facial pain syndromes. Objectives: We now report on an updated questionnaire, the development of a secure web-based neural network application and details of ANNs trained to diagnose patients with different facial pain syndromes. Methods: Online facial pain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,12,13 Using the Burchiel classification of facial pain, all patients reviewed for this study had Type 1 TN, characterized by idiopathic, episodic, lancinating pain lasting several seconds, with pain-free intervals between attacks. Importantly, these patients did not have Type 2 TN, which is predominantly (> 50% of the time) aching, throbbing, or burning pain with a minor component of lancinating pain.…”
Section: Methods Study Design and Diagnostic Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,12,13 Using the Burchiel classification of facial pain, all patients reviewed for this study had Type 1 TN, characterized by idiopathic, episodic, lancinating pain lasting several seconds, with pain-free intervals between attacks. Importantly, these patients did not have Type 2 TN, which is predominantly (> 50% of the time) aching, throbbing, or burning pain with a minor component of lancinating pain.…”
Section: Methods Study Design and Diagnostic Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis was made using clinical interview and examination. 19,23,24 Using the Burchiel 3 classification of facial pain, all patients had TN-I, characterized by idiopathic, episodic, lancinating pain lasting several seconds, with pain-free intervals between attacks. Importantly, these patients did not have what is described as TN-II, which is predominantly (> 50% of the time) aching, throbbing, or burning pain, with a minor component of lancinating pain.…”
Section: Methods Study Design and Diagnostic Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,39 In each case, the diagnosis of classic TN was confirmed according to the ICHD (International Classification of Headache Disorders) 25 criteria and was compliant with newer classic TN diagnostic and classification criteria. 11,28 All the patients included in the study underwent MRI examinations using the standardized protocol previously published. 22,23 Per protocol, all of these examinations included 3 high-resolution sequences centered on the trigeminal root: 3D T2-weighted driven equilibrium, 3D time-of-flight (TOF) angiography, and 3D T1-weighted sequences with gadolinium.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%