2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of an autologous bioengineered composite skin in extensive burns: Clinical and functional outcomes. A multicentric study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some models of bilayered skin substitutes produced in the laboratory have been reported to allow permanent coverage of full-thickness wound, to reduce the need for harvesting autografts, and are indicated as an adjunct treatment for massive burns. 1–3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models of bilayered skin substitutes produced in the laboratory have been reported to allow permanent coverage of full-thickness wound, to reduce the need for harvesting autografts, and are indicated as an adjunct treatment for massive burns. 1–3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 To obtain an inexpensive substitute, another evaluation strategy was to graft autologous fibroblasts and keratinocytes with plasma from the blood bank. 62 In this study, 25 burned patients (74% TBSA) were treated with a final 49% successful engraftment. Fewer infections concomitant to graft were significantly associated with better engraftment, and cosmetic and functional outcomes were satisfactory 4 years later.…”
Section: Tissue Engineering and Cell Graftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But one way to combine both approaches is the use of clotted human plasma that results in the formation of a plasma-based fibrin matrix (hPBM): a fibrin scaffold containing all plasma factors without platelets. hPBM have been more recently used as skin scaffolds in vitro, in vivo (Alexaline et al, 2015;Llames et al, 2004;Monfort, Soriano-Navarro, Garcia-Verdugo, & Izeta, 2013) and on patients (Gomez et al, 2011;Llames et al, 2006;Mohamed Haflah et al, 2018) showing interesting properties in skin bioengineering. Indeed, we have previously shown that human plasma-based epidermal substitutes (hPBES) have a better regenerative potential than conventional CEAs, with less clonal conversion (Alexaline et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%