2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of an electronic health record data sharing system for identifying current contraceptive use within the WWAMI region Practice and Research Network

Abstract: Quality metrics related to contraceptive use that rely on EHR data in this study's data-sharing system likely under-estimated true contraceptive use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If patients received care for LARC-related issues at other clinics, or lost Medicaid eligibility, continuation rates may be falsely high. While the electronic health record (EHR) was used to access contraception encounter data, the accuracy of the records has the potential for incomplete data [ 50 ], which may affect results. One such limitation is the inability of our EHR to ascertain the number of women who intended to be on LARC but were unable to obtain it and never returned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If patients received care for LARC-related issues at other clinics, or lost Medicaid eligibility, continuation rates may be falsely high. While the electronic health record (EHR) was used to access contraception encounter data, the accuracy of the records has the potential for incomplete data [ 50 ], which may affect results. One such limitation is the inability of our EHR to ascertain the number of women who intended to be on LARC but were unable to obtain it and never returned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several common elements to the structure of PBRNs (Hayes & Burge, 2012; Kelly, Kiger, et al, 2015; Westfall et al, 2019): (1) a mission statement, (2) selection of an overall leader (preferably a practitioner), (3) ongoing relationship with academic research partners, (4) support staff to execute research tasks (postdoctoral fellow, research assistant), (5) a board or mechanisms within agencies to gather feedback (steering committee, client advocacy groups, stakeholder boards), and (6) a set of tools or processes that are used to disseminate findings within agencies. PBRNs tend to expand in scope over time, initially focusing on everyday issues and gradually growing to take on more difficult projects with more involved methods (e.g., building shared data systems, testing system level interventions, Godfrey et al, 2018). The flexibility of the model allows stakeholders to adapt it to their context, which is part of its value.…”
Section: Pbrn Structure Leadership and Participatory Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research team considered potential sources to obtain contraceptive exposure data, such as regional and national practice-based or patient-centered networks, which allow data from different electronic medical record platforms to be extracted en masse through a single data sharing system. However, without a linked pharmacy database to verify contraceptive prescriptions, misclassification of contraceptive exposure was likely [ 16 ], and neither source included over-the-counter methods such as condoms or natural family planning. Most population-based data that link prior use of contraception with health outcomes in the United States use self-respondent surveys [ 17 - 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%