The increasing use of minimally invasive techniques in colon and rectal surgery has led to widespread use of energy devices for tissue dissection and vessel sealing. Traditional devices for major vascular control, such as clips and vascular staplers, have been slowly replaced by energy devices due to their convenience and cost-effectiveness [1]. The use of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing devices and ultrasonic energy devices has already been shown to be safe and effective in minimally invasive colon and rectal surgery [2]. Animal studies comparing EnSeal Ò (ES) (Ethicon Inc., Cincinnati, OH) with other bipolar devices have shown favorable results with higher burst pressures, comparable sealing time, and less lateral thermal damage [3]. However, to date, there are no large studies reporting clinical effectiveness of ES on mesenteric vessels in humans.In our practice, ES is used for vascular control, tissue dissection, and splenic flexure mobilization when applicable. The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is isolated and transected close to its origin from the aorta in resections for cancer (Fig. 1). In benign cases, a small stump is preserved. In all cases, the hypogastric nerves are identified and preserved. Isolation of the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is undertaken below the lower border of the pancreas, and the main trunk is sealed and divided with the ES. We completely skeletonize the vessels before sealing and transection. During transection, care is taken to avoid tension and tenting of the vessel in order to avoid disruption and bleeding. In robotic-assisted resections, tissue dissection is carried out using a monopolar hook cautery and the bedside assistant transects the mesenteric vessels using the ES device through a 5-mm port.We reviewed a prospectively maintained database of patients in our practice to assess the safety and efficacy of the ES bipolar device in ligation of inferior mesenteric vessels. Four hundred consecutive laparoscopic and robotic left colon and rectal resections between August 2007 and October 2011 where the ES device was used for sealing of inferior mesenteric vessels were included. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study.Intraoperatively, six patients (1.5 %) had bleeding following vascular control of the IMA by ES. None required conversion or a major change in operative approach. Endostitch (n = 1), endoloop (n = 3), and endoclips (n = 2) were successfully used to control the bleeding. Two of these patients were noted to have calcified vessels. One patient required 4 units of packed red blood cells postoperatively; however, this patient did not have ES failure intraoperatively and the blood loss was found to be unrelated to inadequate vessel sealing. Main branch IMV sealing and transection were uneventful in all cases.None of the patients had intraoperative thermal injuries to the bowel or ureteric injuries during colonic mobilization. No patient was returned to the operating room for hemorrhage, bowel perforation, ischemic bowel, or ureteral injur...