2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Apfel Simplified Risk Score to Guide Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis in Adult Patients Undergoing Same-day Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same phenomenon was observed in NRS scores for PONV in the overall patients. According to the Apfel risk assessment scale for nausea and vomiting, the most common risk indicators currently used are history of motion sickness, smoking, sex (male or female), and opioid exposure 17 , 18 . These factors were simultaneously included in the multivariate regression analysis in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same phenomenon was observed in NRS scores for PONV in the overall patients. According to the Apfel risk assessment scale for nausea and vomiting, the most common risk indicators currently used are history of motion sickness, smoking, sex (male or female), and opioid exposure 17 , 18 . These factors were simultaneously included in the multivariate regression analysis in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMSE scores ranged from 0 to 30, with 27 to 30 being normal and<27 being possible cognitive impairment. As for PONV scores, 0 indicated no nausea and vomiting, 1 indicated nausea only, 2 indicated vomiting only, and 3 indicated nausea and vomiting 10 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for PONV scores, 0 indicated no nausea and vomiting, 1 indicated nausea only, 2 indicated vomiting only, and 3 indicated nausea and vomiting. 10 Statistical Analysis SPSS 26.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. Normally distributed measures were expressed as mean ± SD, and independent samples t-test was used for comparison between groups.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%